With new archived info on the older Spyro games specifically during their production, we got shown a colored version of Charles Zembillas' concept sketch art. I just really like the color schemes there and I can see why they couldn't do it. Gradients be damn hard to pull off in 1990's especially when you got all the polygons that can just kill your game on the PS1. So of course I wanted to draw the proto Spyro named "Pete" in initial pitches and testing. With my own flare and accidentally made this amalgamation that is LoS with Reignited style mash. Wanted his horns to be more curved for Ramming but accidentally did like softer LoS horns. The muzzle I think we both can tell how we got to this result tbh. Makes me wonder if Krome had this sketch and decided to try their hands and got the LoS style. Leaving the concept up there so you guys can see where I got the anatomy situation from.
Disney if you are gunning for me, you didn't name your dragon "Pete". Pete was the kid that hung out with the dragon you damn frauds go back to making women in the LGBT+ looking like puppy killers. Ya raving mad lads. Ugh (Oh speaking of Disney, I'm not drawing Sisu. Her older concepts were better and I think the design team had no balls only marketable white noise).
Disney if you are gunning for me, you didn't name your dragon "Pete". Pete was the kid that hung out with the dragon you damn frauds go back to making women in the LGBT+ looking like puppy killers. Ya raving mad lads. Ugh (Oh speaking of Disney, I'm not drawing Sisu. Her older concepts were better and I think the design team had no balls only marketable white noise).
Category Artwork (Digital) / Fanart
Species Dragon (Other)
Size 1280 x 853px
File Size 204.2 kB
Listed in Folders
I'm not sorry. Disney almost 2015 has been doing performative stunts while pushing for anti-gay laws via big Disney money. As a person that grew up when they had a soul, it's appalling and insulting to see.
They do not care if you run up to defense on a 4 year old art piece that drills into them in the description, they only care about your wallet. So I really don't understand why you pulled up for their defense when they are unironically one of the people that almost owns the corporate world.
They do not care if you run up to defense on a 4 year old art piece that drills into them in the description, they only care about your wallet. So I really don't understand why you pulled up for their defense when they are unironically one of the people that almost owns the corporate world.
I could not understand that, nor get it since it did took place in 2015. I was just pointing it out the developers of Spyro likely are aware the connection of the movie Pete's Dragon but the character himself is a human. I was also just saying I doubt Disney would sue the developers because the reasons I aforementioned.
If it was also up to me, I would use the discard concept names and concept designs as my characters. Like this, I would make this dragon my own yet give him a different appearance.
If it was also up to me, I would use the discard concept names and concept designs as my characters. Like this, I would make this dragon my own yet give him a different appearance.
I was replying to your comment on "You didn't have to rip into Disney like that" and I'm just stating, that I'm not sorry about that since. As I failed to word Disney has been almost soulless since 2015 and continued to be so. Please do not try to duck me about that not being apart of your comment.
Literally did not mind everything else about the comment (otherwise would've addressed it) until you just spilled "You didn't have to rip into Disney like that".
Literally did not mind everything else about the comment (otherwise would've addressed it) until you just spilled "You didn't have to rip into Disney like that".
FA+

Comments