
<<< PREV | FIRST | NEXT >>>
I have no snarky comment for this page. There's really nothing funny about this.
This page took an eternity. . . .
This comic is a sequel! The first comic, 'Cruelty', can be read here: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/3704554/
Posting this disclaimer on every page, so no one can say they didn't see it. No need to read it if you already have, it's just for newcomers:
- This comic will contain adult content, swearing, violence, death, and some very difficult political and social subject matter. If you're the sort of sensitive person who can't handle that, this comic is not for you.
- Not ALL of the content in this comic will be posted online. I'll be withholding one of the adult scenes from the online release, reserved for the eventual print release. HOWEVER. Just like 'Cruelty', this comic WILL have one full adult scene posted online. Any complaints about the withheld content will be ignored, and likely scorned by the folks who DO enjoy what's posted online. So don't be an ass.
- This comic is GAY. GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY! I cannot express this ENOUGH, seeing as there was some confusion with 'Cruelty'. This comic follows the storyline of 'Cruelty' regardless of which 'path' you took, but it is assumed the characters eventually began a relationship. The comic deals with gay issues, as well as a gay relationship. Deal with it, or GTFO.
I have no snarky comment for this page. There's really nothing funny about this.
This page took an eternity. . . .
This comic is a sequel! The first comic, 'Cruelty', can be read here: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/3704554/
Posting this disclaimer on every page, so no one can say they didn't see it. No need to read it if you already have, it's just for newcomers:
- This comic will contain adult content, swearing, violence, death, and some very difficult political and social subject matter. If you're the sort of sensitive person who can't handle that, this comic is not for you.
- Not ALL of the content in this comic will be posted online. I'll be withholding one of the adult scenes from the online release, reserved for the eventual print release. HOWEVER. Just like 'Cruelty', this comic WILL have one full adult scene posted online. Any complaints about the withheld content will be ignored, and likely scorned by the folks who DO enjoy what's posted online. So don't be an ass.
- This comic is GAY. GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY! I cannot express this ENOUGH, seeing as there was some confusion with 'Cruelty'. This comic follows the storyline of 'Cruelty' regardless of which 'path' you took, but it is assumed the characters eventually began a relationship. The comic deals with gay issues, as well as a gay relationship. Deal with it, or GTFO.
Category Artwork (Digital) / General Furry Art
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 765 x 1053px
File Size 238.4 kB
Listed in Folders
It's funny cause in the Good Book itself, the Christians were fed to the lions by the Romans and Pilot. Best and the most positive dipction of Christ in my opinion has to be from Student Bodies where in one part of the story arc Christ on the Cross is depicted as a Lion.
it's funny, because Jesus first simbol was a fish. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ichthys
anyways, lamb and lioon were also pretty important because of the meaning.
anyways, lamb and lioon were also pretty important because of the meaning.
I'm actually working on a series of children's books ^^; the first is on handling breast cancer/grief/healing (a personal project in memory of past family members), the next is on autism/aspergers-awareness, and the third is of two stags that adopted a young fox, and how that family unit interacts with the world around them (and how the community interacts with them and all that fun stuff. Keep in mind, that's the really dumbed down version of it). There's many more after that, but those three are the main ones I'm working on XD
I'm writing and illustrating and self-publishing everything, and it'll be a year or so before everything is out. But I'm working on em ^^; I haven't uploaded anything on it, simply because I don't want my personal art and that art getting mixed up (or rather, tainted by the world that is furry perversion) XD
I'm writing and illustrating and self-publishing everything, and it'll be a year or so before everything is out. But I'm working on em ^^; I haven't uploaded anything on it, simply because I don't want my personal art and that art getting mixed up (or rather, tainted by the world that is furry perversion) XD
Absolutely not. If you're going to get involved in an activist group (the members of this church group protested at a funeral of a gay boy), you should expect retaliation. Protesting is, in a way, the non-violent variation of Civil War. It can get violent though, if unchecked.
Thank you! I'm all for the use of free speech, and that means sometimes you're gonna be faced with things that offend -you-, that's gonna happen. And when it does, you can do one of two things: Get worked up over it and protest, counter protest, ect ect, and try to get something banned or censored to fit -your- sensibilities. ( Very much like a Certain US Political Party, at least it seems like that).
OR, you do what myself and other people with a damn brain in their head do.
Change the god damn channel. Hit the back button on the browser. Leave that particular store. Don't see that "offensive" movie.
Not that tough people. XD
OR, you do what myself and other people with a damn brain in their head do.
Change the god damn channel. Hit the back button on the browser. Leave that particular store. Don't see that "offensive" movie.
Not that tough people. XD
Exactly. Sometimes it's better to do just that than get upset to the degree Marc and his friends are there in the comic. Sometimes it's better to point and laugh at the Westburo Baptist Church and move on with your life, than to get massive amounts of asspain over it. It just means they win in the long run.
Not only do they win in the long run, but they get ammo and justification for their hate. I swear, I won over some friends once by not being a dick...suddenly they had someone who is LGBT in their lives, and instead of acting like a total asshole, I just calmly stayed polite and kind.
It gets harder to hate someone when they have literally no reason to do so.
I know plenty of folk who would argue against it, that we should all go shove our orientation in people's faces until they tolerate us, but...my goal is ACCEPTANCE, not TOLERANCE. ;)
Thus far everything you've said is well-worded and IMO right. Mad respect, dude.
It gets harder to hate someone when they have literally no reason to do so.
I know plenty of folk who would argue against it, that we should all go shove our orientation in people's faces until they tolerate us, but...my goal is ACCEPTANCE, not TOLERANCE. ;)
Thus far everything you've said is well-worded and IMO right. Mad respect, dude.
Moderation is my creed, and to that I counter your point with this.
Evil prevails when good men do nothing.
IE: when you turn your back to problems they don't go away they go on about there business with out you, and while that does remove you from the situation, if the situation is allowed to elevate it can come to you anyways and in a way that is far worse than before. While its never wise to provoke a hostile situation it is also unwise to stand idle.
In this situation you could protest a church and look like the bad guy or you could stand idly by as your rights are being protested and slowly whittled away at. Alternatively you could do what most pro rights organizations in the world today do and protest civilly in public domains, in a attempt to be the better person.
Evil prevails when good men do nothing.
IE: when you turn your back to problems they don't go away they go on about there business with out you, and while that does remove you from the situation, if the situation is allowed to elevate it can come to you anyways and in a way that is far worse than before. While its never wise to provoke a hostile situation it is also unwise to stand idle.
In this situation you could protest a church and look like the bad guy or you could stand idly by as your rights are being protested and slowly whittled away at. Alternatively you could do what most pro rights organizations in the world today do and protest civilly in public domains, in a attempt to be the better person.
True, and your quote there has real meaning on an International basis, one only needs to look at Chamberlain and the the Germans in the mid 30s to see the truth in that. I'm all for expression of freedom of speech, but there are limits. and in both cases, on the Pastor's part and on the part of Marcus, they have exceeded that limit and have gone from protesting right to antagonism.
The problem is, you'll never change anything that way. Do you think black people gained equal rights through turning a blind eye to racism when it was all around them? No. They protested. I can see what you're saying though - this kind of approach doesn't do much other than antagonise the situation, however you can't just turn a blind eye to persecution and prejudice.
You have a point, and I agree, but in the scope of things, Gays have had it easy, it's comparative to what Hispanics and Asians have gone through in comparison to the shit Blacks have dealt with in this Country.
Thats of course not down playing the shit any of those groups have had to go through of course. But you never saw Gays getting washed down the street with fire hoses. I mean, yes, you had the Stonewall Riots in the late 60s, but it wasn't to the degree of what the Marchers for Civil Rights faced in the Southern States.
Thats of course not down playing the shit any of those groups have had to go through of course. But you never saw Gays getting washed down the street with fire hoses. I mean, yes, you had the Stonewall Riots in the late 60s, but it wasn't to the degree of what the Marchers for Civil Rights faced in the Southern States.
its kind of a fallacy to argue who has "had it worse"
one could argue...the Native Americans had it worse, where as blacks were considered 3/5s a white man where as Native Americans were not even viewed upon as human but rather vermin that needed to be exterminated...or that even black on black violence in Africa was worse....
one could argue...the Native Americans had it worse, where as blacks were considered 3/5s a white man where as Native Americans were not even viewed upon as human but rather vermin that needed to be exterminated...or that even black on black violence in Africa was worse....
Indeed it is. Thank you for saying this.
Also for those whom say "gays have it easy" don't forget many gay men were locked up for no other reason than being gay. Many states had these laws on the books well into the 90's. And even today gays are having to fight tooth and nail for the most basic of rights, such as anti-bulling. Even these laws are fought hard by the Christian Right! So here we are again it's okay from Christians to bully others but it's not for gays to do it back. Futhermore how many more sucides is it going to take for the gay community to catch up and be worthy of other civil rights movements. Perhaps one day some will wise up and see that gays don't have it so easy after all.
Also for those whom say "gays have it easy" don't forget many gay men were locked up for no other reason than being gay. Many states had these laws on the books well into the 90's. And even today gays are having to fight tooth and nail for the most basic of rights, such as anti-bulling. Even these laws are fought hard by the Christian Right! So here we are again it's okay from Christians to bully others but it's not for gays to do it back. Futhermore how many more sucides is it going to take for the gay community to catch up and be worthy of other civil rights movements. Perhaps one day some will wise up and see that gays don't have it so easy after all.
" So here we are again it's okay from Christians to bully others but it's not for gays to do it back."
Ok, so is it bad that I saw gays getting bullied by *gasp* athiests more than Christians, and in fact saw more Christians stand up for said gays to protect them back in high school?
Ok, so is it bad that I saw gays getting bullied by *gasp* athiests more than Christians, and in fact saw more Christians stand up for said gays to protect them back in high school?
Have it easy you say! Okay how about bulling for no other fucking reason that being gay! Yea I was fucked with for years back in the early 90's when I finished high school. Beat up you name it buddy! Not to menintion the name calling and being shunned. Even today this is going on! And the best slap across the face is the Christian Right fights hard to stop each anti-bulling laws that come up! Also one other thing, I had to move out of the county even because my partner is male. And guess what? Because of DOMA I could not sponsor him as a straight couple could! So friend let me ask you, how many more sucides, broken bones, and lack of basic rights will
it take before we're worthy of other civil rights movements!
it take before we're worthy of other civil rights movements!
so that give you the right to kill all the religious people and shit? that's like saying all black people have to right to abuse white people because they were treated like shit, and are they better people than the caucasians because they were discriminated? hating anyone to achieve what is right is never the solution. these days the LGBT community is turning into a huge mess because of morons like you and i am not even sorry to say it.
LOL First off kid I never said anything what do ever about killing anyone. If you want to take my metaphors out of context that's your issue. Second off I've been working hard to get rights for gay people longer than you've been alive. Third you don't know me at all so please mind your own business and leave these maters to people whom know what there doing.
Gays have it easy? Are you kidding me?
In many parts of the world, just saying you're gay will get you brutally murdered or even executed by your own government.
I don't go a week without hearing about a gay or trans assault, murder, or suicide that could be linked to anti-LGBT bias.
It's bad enough that I can't i marry my fiancé. If we travel to a state that has marriage equality just to get married, then we come back to Wisconsin, we could be fined up to $10,000 and jailed for up to 9 months.
We haven't been washed down the streets with fire hoses because we're not nearly numerous enough as any racial group is going to be.
Us "having it easy" is not only untrue and irrelevant, it's a slap in the face of everyone working to make things better when you use it as a justification NOT to use our freedom of speech to fight back in every possible form. Protesting, educating, lobbying, merely existing and being everyday people, it takes all types to win these battles.
In many parts of the world, just saying you're gay will get you brutally murdered or even executed by your own government.
I don't go a week without hearing about a gay or trans assault, murder, or suicide that could be linked to anti-LGBT bias.
It's bad enough that I can't i marry my fiancé. If we travel to a state that has marriage equality just to get married, then we come back to Wisconsin, we could be fined up to $10,000 and jailed for up to 9 months.
We haven't been washed down the streets with fire hoses because we're not nearly numerous enough as any racial group is going to be.
Us "having it easy" is not only untrue and irrelevant, it's a slap in the face of everyone working to make things better when you use it as a justification NOT to use our freedom of speech to fight back in every possible form. Protesting, educating, lobbying, merely existing and being everyday people, it takes all types to win these battles.
"We haven't been washed down the streets with fire hoses because we're not nearly numerous enough as any racial group is going to be."
Not to mention when was the last time you saw a bunch of gays group up into a violent mob and require such force to stop them? Stonewall? That's one mild instance in comparison to the numerous instances of riots that had nothing to do with gays both before and after that.
You are correct though, gays have been tortured and killed in the most horrendous of ways, just for being gay, for a long time. Yes, the slaves were abused and mistreated and killed, I don't deny that, but I don't recall hearing much about people spending their money to buy slaves just to kill them in horrendous ways.. especially when they have been able to do so freely to gays for a lot longer.
Even to this day we have to put up with being tormented, beat, mutilated, curb-stomped, burned to death, disembodied, and a whole lot worse.. all the while still being denied basic civil rights in the majority of the world, and just for being gay. The horrendous things that have been done to gays over the years would make people sick just to know about them, and it's still going on all over the world and in the united states.
I do also agree with Paletero's post about the American Indians. People sure went out of their way to exterminate them as well.
Not to mention when was the last time you saw a bunch of gays group up into a violent mob and require such force to stop them? Stonewall? That's one mild instance in comparison to the numerous instances of riots that had nothing to do with gays both before and after that.
You are correct though, gays have been tortured and killed in the most horrendous of ways, just for being gay, for a long time. Yes, the slaves were abused and mistreated and killed, I don't deny that, but I don't recall hearing much about people spending their money to buy slaves just to kill them in horrendous ways.. especially when they have been able to do so freely to gays for a lot longer.
Even to this day we have to put up with being tormented, beat, mutilated, curb-stomped, burned to death, disembodied, and a whole lot worse.. all the while still being denied basic civil rights in the majority of the world, and just for being gay. The horrendous things that have been done to gays over the years would make people sick just to know about them, and it's still going on all over the world and in the united states.
I do also agree with Paletero's post about the American Indians. People sure went out of their way to exterminate them as well.
Yeah, all of the murders, "corrective rape", beating up gays/lebians and driving to suicide of LGBT people thought the globe is "having it easy".
Don't narrow your perspective to American history, either. You have no idea what happens to people who are as far as -suspected- to be gay in Russia, Serbia, Iraq, Uganda, Kenya, India...
Don't narrow your perspective to American history, either. You have no idea what happens to people who are as far as -suspected- to be gay in Russia, Serbia, Iraq, Uganda, Kenya, India...
If you read my comment, I said I wasnt downplaying what they have gone through, but while it's shitty it really cant hold a candle to the over 200 years of shit the Blacks have gone through in the United States. I'm also well aware of what goes on elsewhere in the world, but I used the US as a basis because it seems like thats where the comic is set.
I totally agree with you. Too many people are quick to put up their dukes or pull out their guns instead of actually sitting down and talking it out. I'm not saying that sometimes its NOT better to fight, like when an enemy has made it ABUNDANTLY clear they won't stop until you're dead. But if there are people willing to negotiate, stop and do that instead of just shooting everyone, ya know?
War is ugly.
War is ugly.
Just saying this, if someone protested the funeral of someone I know, I'd just go over there with a bat and hit them, don't care If i get arrested. everyone over thinks this, no matter what they are going to think their right even if you you march, protest, leave them alone, might as well bruise em a bit. Not saying the lions should get beat up, I already hate the protesters in this comic, if anything i'd beat up those protesters.
Agreed! I don't care what religion you are, people need not think there special because of there bed time story book says it okay to hate gays. So yea let them have there protest, but they shouldn't be surprised when they get a chair thrown at them or when we show up at there house!
you're such a hateful idiot. grow up with gay hating stories? my parents raised me christian (although i don't feel like one) they told me to accept people as they are. look who's talking! the LGBT community is just as intolerant as the churches and you're probably telling your kids and nephews to hate on religious people at bed times too. talk about who's really intolerant! there is no reason to hate a whole group because of the hateful idiots. fuck you. you're worse than the people at westborough church. I HOPE YOU DON'T MESS UP THE REPUTATION OF LGBT COMMUNITY BECAUSE I DON'T WANT MY GAY FRIENDS TO LOOK LIKE DOUCHEBAGS THANKS TO AN ASSHOLE LIKE YOU.
Again kiddo I'm older, wiser, and have been through much more than you have I can assure you! Futhemore what you just said is down right laughable! Might I sudgest you at the very least calm down before you pound out another reply in all capital letters to show just how childish you really are. As I said before you don't know me at all yet you've taken time to confront just me. Wow that makes me feel special! :) Anywho just so ya know I was raised Christian also but left that mind trap many years ago. With luck one day you'll do the same. And hey also does your holy document not have something to say about turning the other cheek? Just food for thought.
Well I don't care if they hate gays. I'm gay and I fucking hate most gays, whiney leftist weak gays. I like normal gays, unfortunately there's not alot of us in my experience. I hate them because they protest funerals, the people fighting for the freedom they use to bash them, no respect, not only that, but they call everyone fags, even the straight ones, their wife and children could be there and they would still say shit like "fag" it doesn't make sense.
Well I don't like the left, but i don't really care what someone's politics are unless they actually in government. Good to hear your not a femboy, I swear if I saw one more of those I was gonna punch something, I'm like surrounded by them in rl and the numbers are growing all the time, people coming out of the closet and i just take one look and im like.. Not surprised hahaha
Oh hell no. Back in the day I was skinny as hell. Got beat up like everyday also! Growing up in the damn bible belt was hard as hell! In high school I said that's enough of that shit and got pumped. Also those dumb asses that keep battling me down there clearly have never been in the shit. Makes me laugh my ass off seeing kids talk shit to grown men on a furry website. :p
Haha thats awesome, I use to be a small little weak kid when i was like 14, by 15 I was just like "gotta be able to beat someone up" the schools didn't do anything about harassment, they just want to to curl up and wait for a teacher to come to your aid, fuck that, i just break their nose. There was even a time when 7 dudes wanted to jump me but aaalll of them chickened out when the time came. I don't understand how anyone with a y chromosome would want to be that defenseless, then complain when someone picks on them, if you are gonna act like a fag, then your a fag, and if you want the bullying to stop, man up.
Gays and lesbians have found a little more traction with the Democratic party simply because their existence isn't met with a (symbolic, but occasionally literal) chorus of boos and a forced shuffling off the national stage. I don't see how the marriage issue is particularly tied to any political leaning, though. How is a consistent, recognized equal platform for building families (marriage equality) anything but a boon to the economy and a net improvement in quality of life?
And by the way, what I consider to be destroying the country is the petty "can't appear to let them gain an inch" party line voting blocks. If legislators considered bills being presented on their own merits and thought for themselves, I find it unfathomable that everyone in either party would be voting the same way.
And by the way, what I consider to be destroying the country is the petty "can't appear to let them gain an inch" party line voting blocks. If legislators considered bills being presented on their own merits and thought for themselves, I find it unfathomable that everyone in either party would be voting the same way.
How do you know that? Do you know of any studies that show what percentage of LGBT people belong to each political affiliation?
Let's try an analogy. A terrorist or somebody has a gun to the head of an innocent person. All the liberals and lefties are screaming "No! Don't kill him! He's innocent!"
By your logic, you should be rooting that terrorist on. Anything to get back at those damn liberals.
Extreme example but I want your honest feedback on it.
Let's try an analogy. A terrorist or somebody has a gun to the head of an innocent person. All the liberals and lefties are screaming "No! Don't kill him! He's innocent!"
By your logic, you should be rooting that terrorist on. Anything to get back at those damn liberals.
Extreme example but I want your honest feedback on it.
That doesn't even make sense, when did I ever say no matter what I disagree with everything and anything someone slightly left says? putting words in my mouth, thats a bad bird, you should stop doing that. Well i'm done here, back to my real life blah blah blah, violins ect ect, already told your little fuck buddy, see yah.
Okay so clearly there's some threshold between letting couples of the same gender and murder that you place above politics.
Where is that threshold? Why will you dismiss the inequality I suffer from, yet you'll transcend your political bias to save someone from being shot in the head?
Where is that threshold? Why will you dismiss the inequality I suffer from, yet you'll transcend your political bias to save someone from being shot in the head?
How about we look at some of those republicans who shout anti-gay stuff in general, while faving gay porn/hooking up on "Rent-A-Boy.com" behind the scenes. Since you are behind a computer screen, i can't tell if you are telling the truth now. That's all I need to know
There is a point when trolling is not trolling anymore, and it is bullying. How many times do you tell your bullied child to just ignore the bullying until something bad happens? We tried to "do the right thing" and tell on the WBC for protesting funerals, and they had a huge debt to pay afterwards... however, upon all kinds of appeals and shitty legal loopholes, almost all of the settlement they were supposed to pay was erased.
What do you do when diplomacy and the authorities don't stop a rotten tomato from spoiling the soup? I'm all for free-speech, but sometimes when "free-speech" inhibits social progress and prevents civil liberties from occurring (such as a peaceful funeral for a family to mourn its loved one), people need to step up to the plate and start exercising their "free-speech" too.
A major turning point in the LGBT Rights movement were the Stonewall Riots. One of the first times in USA history where we fought back against the police and society as they kept trying to corner, convict, and control us. It was violent... and it woke people up and got them to pay attention to the movement. The opening paragraph of Wikipedia sums up pretty much exactly what I learned in class and books about it...
"The Stonewall riots were a series of spontaneous, violent demonstrations against a police raid that took place in the early morning hours of June 28, 1969, at the Stonewall Inn, in the Greenwich Village neighborhood of New York City. They are frequently cited as the first instance in American history when people in the homosexual community fought back against a government-sponsored system that persecuted sexual minorities, and they have become the defining event that marked the start of the gay rights movement in the United States and around the world."
I prefer peace, but I won't deny that sometimes not being the better person can have long-term benefits. As Mordin Solus said to his student, “Lots of ways to help people. Sometimes heal patients; sometimes execute dangerous people. Either way helps.” While this is an extreme, it illustrates what I mean.
And Marcus's anti-protest is far from out of line.
What do you do when diplomacy and the authorities don't stop a rotten tomato from spoiling the soup? I'm all for free-speech, but sometimes when "free-speech" inhibits social progress and prevents civil liberties from occurring (such as a peaceful funeral for a family to mourn its loved one), people need to step up to the plate and start exercising their "free-speech" too.
A major turning point in the LGBT Rights movement were the Stonewall Riots. One of the first times in USA history where we fought back against the police and society as they kept trying to corner, convict, and control us. It was violent... and it woke people up and got them to pay attention to the movement. The opening paragraph of Wikipedia sums up pretty much exactly what I learned in class and books about it...
"The Stonewall riots were a series of spontaneous, violent demonstrations against a police raid that took place in the early morning hours of June 28, 1969, at the Stonewall Inn, in the Greenwich Village neighborhood of New York City. They are frequently cited as the first instance in American history when people in the homosexual community fought back against a government-sponsored system that persecuted sexual minorities, and they have become the defining event that marked the start of the gay rights movement in the United States and around the world."
I prefer peace, but I won't deny that sometimes not being the better person can have long-term benefits. As Mordin Solus said to his student, “Lots of ways to help people. Sometimes heal patients; sometimes execute dangerous people. Either way helps.” While this is an extreme, it illustrates what I mean.
And Marcus's anti-protest is far from out of line.
I really wish I wouldn't be so quick to click the button. XD Important factors to consider...
1. Marcus doesn't want violence, and even said that if violence were to occur, it wouldn't start with them.
2. The world isn't as black and white as we want to believe. Even religious doctrines don't preach this, though through quote-mining one might try to assume that they do. The Koran both says to destroy non-believers AND to befriend your enemies. The Christian Bible has a similar theme.
3. Peace is idealistic, to live and let live, but true peace and prosperity is difficult (at least under the current way the world works), as the Social Conflict Theory of Sociology states. In this particular scenario, the Feminist Theory in Sociology also applies, as it gives a deep examination of not just Sexism in society, but also Heterosexism.
I was initially more drawn to Reis, but I think I prefer Marcus now. While Reis does come from a very different background, I do appreciate his activism immensely, and he's been trying to give Reis a chance to get involved, too, even going as far as to cover all of their bills himself so he can join. While I don't like that Marcus treats him like a pet, Reis's trust issues and over-sensitivity about the fact that he is of a lower social-class than Marcus rubs me the wrong way. Maybe that's just me, but I don't know.
Perhaps I'll end up hating Marcus and loving Reis later on in the story? Who knows, but right now, I'm cheering for Marcus. ^_^
1. Marcus doesn't want violence, and even said that if violence were to occur, it wouldn't start with them.
2. The world isn't as black and white as we want to believe. Even religious doctrines don't preach this, though through quote-mining one might try to assume that they do. The Koran both says to destroy non-believers AND to befriend your enemies. The Christian Bible has a similar theme.
3. Peace is idealistic, to live and let live, but true peace and prosperity is difficult (at least under the current way the world works), as the Social Conflict Theory of Sociology states. In this particular scenario, the Feminist Theory in Sociology also applies, as it gives a deep examination of not just Sexism in society, but also Heterosexism.
I was initially more drawn to Reis, but I think I prefer Marcus now. While Reis does come from a very different background, I do appreciate his activism immensely, and he's been trying to give Reis a chance to get involved, too, even going as far as to cover all of their bills himself so he can join. While I don't like that Marcus treats him like a pet, Reis's trust issues and over-sensitivity about the fact that he is of a lower social-class than Marcus rubs me the wrong way. Maybe that's just me, but I don't know.
Perhaps I'll end up hating Marcus and loving Reis later on in the story? Who knows, but right now, I'm cheering for Marcus. ^_^
Sorry, but there is a time and a place for everything. A funeral certainly isn't the time or place regardless of the reason. However, neither is a place of worship with children and potentially innocent bistanders that could get hurt if anything did break out. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Keep in mind, Marcus doesn't want any violence and made it clear.
Also, this is about the ONLY way they will be able to directly protest against them. It's far easier to plan to protest them at one of their plans, instead of trying to rally everyone together to drive to counter-protest them at their next target, which would be their only option of an "appropriate" way to protest them.
This church reminds me of the WBC more still. They bring their children along on their protests and have them hold up extremely offensive signs that they don't even understand what they mean.
In a battle, people will be hurt... it's unfortunate, but what this church is doing is bullying, and no one is stepping in to make them stop, no authorities, no government, and no one within the church itself. Their actions are being condoned. I won't be sad for the parents of any "hurt" children in the process. If the parent's were smart, they wouldn't be dragging their kids into that mess of a church in the first place, a church filled with Extremist Activists that like to picket and protest at funerals. What kind of good parenting is that? Also, a good parent, if they want to keep their children out of this, will leave the service or church immediately once they see Marcus's group arriving. It's not Marcus's responsibility to take care of those kids.
Also, this is about the ONLY way they will be able to directly protest against them. It's far easier to plan to protest them at one of their plans, instead of trying to rally everyone together to drive to counter-protest them at their next target, which would be their only option of an "appropriate" way to protest them.
This church reminds me of the WBC more still. They bring their children along on their protests and have them hold up extremely offensive signs that they don't even understand what they mean.
In a battle, people will be hurt... it's unfortunate, but what this church is doing is bullying, and no one is stepping in to make them stop, no authorities, no government, and no one within the church itself. Their actions are being condoned. I won't be sad for the parents of any "hurt" children in the process. If the parent's were smart, they wouldn't be dragging their kids into that mess of a church in the first place, a church filled with Extremist Activists that like to picket and protest at funerals. What kind of good parenting is that? Also, a good parent, if they want to keep their children out of this, will leave the service or church immediately once they see Marcus's group arriving. It's not Marcus's responsibility to take care of those kids.
Why do you think a place of worship is not the time or place for protest?
Why do you think children need to be defended from the truth? If they're being indoctrinated into a religion that preaches hatred for any group of people that doesn't deserve it, those children benefit from hearing different viewpoints.
Innocent bystanders that could get hurt if anything did break out are present in any protest situation. So again, why do you think a church is special and should be off limits?
Why do you think children need to be defended from the truth? If they're being indoctrinated into a religion that preaches hatred for any group of people that doesn't deserve it, those children benefit from hearing different viewpoints.
Innocent bystanders that could get hurt if anything did break out are present in any protest situation. So again, why do you think a church is special and should be off limits?
To that extent I could ask you why a funeral should be off limits? You both seem to be missing my point. The church isn't right, but I'm sorry to say, neither is Marcus in this case. Saying that the children would benefit from getting both points of view would be to assume that the children are even old enough to comprehend what's going on, or that they have the capacity to be able to deal with it. This is obviously a difficult enough subject for grown men and women to understand and deal with, let alone a child.
As a parishioner to a local church myself it's my belief that a church, regardless of denomination or leadership is at its basic roots a house of God. To ultimately start a fight, whether by word or by fist isn't appropriate on its grounds. If there is a problem with the leadership of a particular parish there are channels and much higher powers where the fight can be taken that will actually get results. Not everyone within the church is anti-gay. In fact we had our first openly gay bishop...
indigo_the_cat makes the statement that in battle people will get hurt, okay, but let's also take into consideration that even in war you have rules of engagement. Just because you declare war doesn't mean that the gloves all come off and anything goes. And, whether Marcus said they're not out to start violence or not his actions are picking a fight, like poking an angry bull with a stick.
Frankly, I think both sides are being very immature and petty. Forget what the issues are at hand and you simply have two groups disrespecting each other one on one. Marcus wants what's happening to stop, take it to the church diocese. Whether the denomination agrees with their cause or not wouldn't matter if what the church is doing is out of line (which it is). The final word to the bible boils down to Jesus' one outstanding message, "love thy neighbor as thy self."
In conclusion I re-state what I said already, two wrongs don't make a right.
As a parishioner to a local church myself it's my belief that a church, regardless of denomination or leadership is at its basic roots a house of God. To ultimately start a fight, whether by word or by fist isn't appropriate on its grounds. If there is a problem with the leadership of a particular parish there are channels and much higher powers where the fight can be taken that will actually get results. Not everyone within the church is anti-gay. In fact we had our first openly gay bishop...
indigo_the_cat makes the statement that in battle people will get hurt, okay, but let's also take into consideration that even in war you have rules of engagement. Just because you declare war doesn't mean that the gloves all come off and anything goes. And, whether Marcus said they're not out to start violence or not his actions are picking a fight, like poking an angry bull with a stick.
Frankly, I think both sides are being very immature and petty. Forget what the issues are at hand and you simply have two groups disrespecting each other one on one. Marcus wants what's happening to stop, take it to the church diocese. Whether the denomination agrees with their cause or not wouldn't matter if what the church is doing is out of line (which it is). The final word to the bible boils down to Jesus' one outstanding message, "love thy neighbor as thy self."
In conclusion I re-state what I said already, two wrongs don't make a right.
People are grieving at a funeral. A regular church service is not in any way comparable.
I see absolutely no problem with Marcus' behavior.
Children comprehend plenty. And even if they don't comprehend it, what's the harm in letting them experience it anyways?
I do not buy into the children's interest rhetoric, so the burden of proof is on you to show me exactly and specifically how children are harmed by this sort of thing.
I see no reason to believe that your god exists, so I really don't see any reason to respect or fear it or its place of worship.
If there's a problem with the leadership of a particular parish there are indeed several channels through which to express and deal with that problem. It is not up to you or the church to decide what those channels are or which are appropriate.
Violence rarely breaks out in this sort of thing. Physical violence is completely different than verbal discussion and the expression of outrage.
What you and I think about protesters is irrelevant. They have a right to protest and bickering about it solves nothing.
You still haven't shown me why counter-protesting is wrong.
I see absolutely no problem with Marcus' behavior.
Children comprehend plenty. And even if they don't comprehend it, what's the harm in letting them experience it anyways?
I do not buy into the children's interest rhetoric, so the burden of proof is on you to show me exactly and specifically how children are harmed by this sort of thing.
I see no reason to believe that your god exists, so I really don't see any reason to respect or fear it or its place of worship.
If there's a problem with the leadership of a particular parish there are indeed several channels through which to express and deal with that problem. It is not up to you or the church to decide what those channels are or which are appropriate.
Violence rarely breaks out in this sort of thing. Physical violence is completely different than verbal discussion and the expression of outrage.
What you and I think about protesters is irrelevant. They have a right to protest and bickering about it solves nothing.
You still haven't shown me why counter-protesting is wrong.
You're not providing me with any FACTS as to why the counter-protest is right! Your arguments are being based off of personal opinions and emotions. Try stepping back from the situation and disconnecting yourself from either side. My point is that neither side is right. I'm not supporting the actions of the church, but I'm not supporting the actions of the protestors in this scenario either. And, until you have some form of understanding and respect for BOTH sides of the argument you can't justify one side or the other regardless. I don't care one way or the other whether you believe in God or not, but if you're going to present an argument as to why or why it's not right to protest in such a place you need to first have some form of understanding of it, which according to your own statement, you don't. So to debate this any further is completely moot.
Noxal you have my upmost respect and I agree with you 100% here. Unfortunately I suspect the magirity of the people here defending the rights of a church to do what ever the hell they wish with no no risk of any retaliation what so ever. Are most likely Christian them self. And even if they claim to be gay, they will always just sit back and straddle the fence and most likely never protest any antigay propaganda comes from withen the walls of there own church.
For me it's kinda like union work. Everytime there's a group of people that hate the union, will not picket, and never pay a penny to the union fund. Yet they all enjoy the those big pay checks and benifits there union brothers fought hard to get. These kinds of people are called scabs! And it's the same thing that's going on with the gay community today. They all want these rights! But not everyone is willing to fight for them if it might hurt someone's feelings...
For me it's kinda like union work. Everytime there's a group of people that hate the union, will not picket, and never pay a penny to the union fund. Yet they all enjoy the those big pay checks and benifits there union brothers fought hard to get. These kinds of people are called scabs! And it's the same thing that's going on with the gay community today. They all want these rights! But not everyone is willing to fight for them if it might hurt someone's feelings...
Wow... and the trolls come out of the woodwork. You read but you obviously don't comprehend. First, don't start trying to label me as supporting one or the other. My debate was that neither side was correct.
"Disturbing people grieving for their dead child, friend, lover while they are -burying- him with your hate?"
You are out of line, Mois, don't mistake me for supporting the church's actions when I've stated, over and over that neither side is in the right.
"Disturbing people grieving for their dead child, friend, lover while they are -burying- him with your hate?"
You are out of line, Mois, don't mistake me for supporting the church's actions when I've stated, over and over that neither side is in the right.
Just as I said on the last page to someone else. Sometimes violence is nessuary! All this talk I hear about always being peaceful is bullshit comming from children that have never been though anything much less been in the streets. Every civil rights movement I know of had bloodshed before they gained anything!
Violence begets violence.
Don't misunderstand me, sometimes violence IS THE WAY, when there is life-threatening oppression by all means bust out the violence, but...one must weigh the consequences against the gains.
Think of all the borderline fence-sitters we would lose if all of us felt as you do. They would see us as a threat, which is not the message I want to send. Why should they accept us if they feel we are a threat to their very safety?
Don't misunderstand me, sometimes violence IS THE WAY, when there is life-threatening oppression by all means bust out the violence, but...one must weigh the consequences against the gains.
Think of all the borderline fence-sitters we would lose if all of us felt as you do. They would see us as a threat, which is not the message I want to send. Why should they accept us if they feel we are a threat to their very safety?
Back in the day long before Internet the gay community was so much stronger! It's sad that there's so many these days not willing to do anything because of there own personal shame. I'm not saying to go out and punch someone in the face for no reason. But if it ever came down to it your damn right I would take it to the streets. The problem I see today, here first most here. There's a bunch of people who whine, and there's a few that pound there keyboard online. But only a few are willing to stand hand and hand and be willing to take what ever others dish out.
Yes, I did read your comment and that is indeed my reply. I should of said I do agree with you on some of what you said but I must add the following: (inter mass text from my other reply). Anyway my reply was just more of a comment that an answer to any questions, nor was it a question on it's on accord. Just my thoughts and follow up on what you said to me.
Loving your input in the comments here! I'd also love to hear you put this stupid fuck in his place, as I'm already trying to: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/773...../#cid:54381219
After talking with him I honestly think he really does not believe in half of what saying. He's just not willing to cross party lines. Don't let it get under your skin as that's what most naysayers want in the first place. I've had I don't know how many here try there best to get to me. But I've not allowed that to happen, nor have a fallen into there mind traps they've set for me. And that grinds there gears more than anything I could of ever said.
About sinking to their level, protesting the protesters and allsuch, and how they just win in the end. So very true.
An example: for years the only "gay people" my aunt heard about or saw on TV or on the internet were those who did that Folsom (sp?) street parade. They had guys in leather thongs practically fucking in public, and it shocked and horrified her. She also felt that her Christian faith meant she had to hate everyone who is gay because God said so. I will never forget the awkward car trip of awkward where somehow, gay rights came up in conversation, and I was in the car with my dad and aunt...and I was only "out" to my dad. The ensuing argument was a train wreck on so many levels it isn't even funny. Nothing has ever tempted me to leap out of a vehicle doing 70 mph on the highway more than that day.
Now I know it must have been very liberating for some of those people in those pride marches to get their freak on in public, but making a spectacle like that doesn't help ME any, a skinny young queer from a very conservative family in a rather intolerant area. It immediately labels me as "one of THOSE people" and I don't appreciate it! Meant I had to try twice as hard to convince my aunt I'm not a freaking psycho pervert. Plus...I can kinda get behind the concept that those kinds of pride marches are a Bad Idea...the shit I've seen some folk do in those things is not something I wanna see ANYONE do in public, be they gays, lesbians or straight folk. Nor would I want my kid seeing that (yes I have a kiddo, I was in denial for a looooong time). So yeah, I can see why some super-conservative bigots see that and freak right out about the "gay community."
I'm also not talking about people who just march (clothed and stuff) for gay rights either, here. :P That's totally cool.
Now again, I'm sure it is very liberating and freeing, and some of it looks hella fun (gods forbid my family ever find out I have a ponyplay fetish, I bet they'd either all simoutaneously stroke out or skin me alive) but when that's all the some people ever see of the gay community, well...it can make a lot of trouble and can even set back gay rights if the wrong person takes on a personal crusade over it. :(
Sad but true.
An example: for years the only "gay people" my aunt heard about or saw on TV or on the internet were those who did that Folsom (sp?) street parade. They had guys in leather thongs practically fucking in public, and it shocked and horrified her. She also felt that her Christian faith meant she had to hate everyone who is gay because God said so. I will never forget the awkward car trip of awkward where somehow, gay rights came up in conversation, and I was in the car with my dad and aunt...and I was only "out" to my dad. The ensuing argument was a train wreck on so many levels it isn't even funny. Nothing has ever tempted me to leap out of a vehicle doing 70 mph on the highway more than that day.
Now I know it must have been very liberating for some of those people in those pride marches to get their freak on in public, but making a spectacle like that doesn't help ME any, a skinny young queer from a very conservative family in a rather intolerant area. It immediately labels me as "one of THOSE people" and I don't appreciate it! Meant I had to try twice as hard to convince my aunt I'm not a freaking psycho pervert. Plus...I can kinda get behind the concept that those kinds of pride marches are a Bad Idea...the shit I've seen some folk do in those things is not something I wanna see ANYONE do in public, be they gays, lesbians or straight folk. Nor would I want my kid seeing that (yes I have a kiddo, I was in denial for a looooong time). So yeah, I can see why some super-conservative bigots see that and freak right out about the "gay community."
I'm also not talking about people who just march (clothed and stuff) for gay rights either, here. :P That's totally cool.
Now again, I'm sure it is very liberating and freeing, and some of it looks hella fun (gods forbid my family ever find out I have a ponyplay fetish, I bet they'd either all simoutaneously stroke out or skin me alive) but when that's all the some people ever see of the gay community, well...it can make a lot of trouble and can even set back gay rights if the wrong person takes on a personal crusade over it. :(
Sad but true.
Just like Cpt. Dammit said, this is a extremely well said.
I'm slowly starting to come out to people around me and by the gods it is agonizingly slow... I am so insecure about how they will react that it takes me ages to tell them. I've told two of my closest friends, both girls, and they were fine with it, even tho it was weird for one of them initially. After talking about it a little more, we proceeded to laugh our heads off about all kinds of stuff like "Oh my gawd, we totally have to go to the mall and check out the guys there!" and other such silly things.
I was going to write a longer reply, but it was getting personal and, even though I don't mind, I'm almost sure it'll just be boring. So I'll just stop now.... Yah.
I'm slowly starting to come out to people around me and by the gods it is agonizingly slow... I am so insecure about how they will react that it takes me ages to tell them. I've told two of my closest friends, both girls, and they were fine with it, even tho it was weird for one of them initially. After talking about it a little more, we proceeded to laugh our heads off about all kinds of stuff like "Oh my gawd, we totally have to go to the mall and check out the guys there!" and other such silly things.
I was going to write a longer reply, but it was getting personal and, even though I don't mind, I'm almost sure it'll just be boring. So I'll just stop now.... Yah.
Wall of text incoming - rmb, you asked for it!
First of all I must say that being gay in Romania is quite difficult. Most people are quite close-minded when it comes to LGBTs. What is also true however is that most of them are just ignorant people that got the impression that all gay men/boys are limp-wristed, feminine and have a lisp + high pitched voice that want to have sex with every single man/boy they meet. This is mostly due to the media portraying them like that again and again and again. Another problem is that guys here (at least the ones still in highschool) tend to act all macho when they are around other guys. This part-of-a-pack thingy turns many of them into fearless douchebags, harrassing everyone around them and making stupid jokes about everything. Strangely, many of them, when alone, are actually quite nice and intelligent.
Now, on to the more personal stuff. There are lots of guys in school who harrass me (usually just verbally. Never more than a nudge), calling me gay and fag and all those shiny words. Of course, they only do that when in groups of at least 2. Thankfully, they are not from my class. Lucky for me, most of my classmates are cool (god knows what I would have gone thru if I had bullies in my class). But I'm almost afraid to go inside the class of friends from a parallel class, because I just KNOW someone will say something nasty. Even if I ignore me, it still hurts me a little bit on the inside. It's nice however to see that, from time to time, someone shuts them up (usually the friend I'm visitting, but once or twice it happened that some random girl told them to stfu). The way I walk, talk and gesture makes people think I'm gay. I believe. It's as if I bleep like mad on everyone's gaydar, lol!
As I said, I've only come out to two of my closest friends (except for my internet friends), both girls. I'm not sure, but I think that most of my male friends will be at least taken aback if I told them. As I previously noted, they will probably think I'll pounce them and start humping them right then and there, or at least that I'm wishing for that to happen. I can think of one or two who might not react badly, but it's still really hard to tell them, especially since I find, well, fancy one of them. He's just too cute not to fancy!
I live with my parents and my brother. I get along really well with mom+bro and quite well with dad. I'm pretty sure my bro will be okay with me being gay, but I'm not sure about mom and dad is definitely going to go nuts. Well, tbh, my bro most probably knows already that I'm gay, mainly because he caught me, uhm, well, having some fun once while I was alone. But he never mentioned it.
I kept hinting mom that I'm gay and, until recently, I was almost sure she was totally okay with it, almost encouraging me to open up. Now however, I think she might take it bad, at least initially. Why? A few weeks back, after me, bro and her finished lunch, bro asked her,at some point, what she thinks about gay couples that want to have children. She thought about it for a bit, then said that she has to think about it some more and that she'll answer later. Couple mins pass and bro goes to his room, I ask mom if she decided yet and she said something like "No, I'm not sure yet. I think I'm okay with it, even though gay people make me feel a bit distressed." It was a bit shocking for me, since I thought she was okay with them.
I've also dropped some hints to my brother. We discussed about how many people think me and my best friend are together (the one I came out two who took it bad at first). My brother said that we might be in a relationship one day, who knows, to which I calmly replied "No.". He wondered why, and I told him that there is a reason why we won't be together and that it's something related to me, and left it at that.
So, now I'm at sort of a stand still (a one man stand still, is that even possible?). I do now know what to do next. Should I come out to my bro first, then to my family (with his support)? Should I come out to more of my friends and/or my classmates? Should I wait until I meet someone and, once in a relationship, come out to family/friends, only coming out to my closest female friends? Should I keep lying/dodging the question "Are you gay or something?" (and similar ones; lying in case of acquaintances, dodging in case of friends because I absolutely loathe lying to my friends)? Should I just calmly answer with the truth to these questions? Should I interrupt and correct people (usually family or family friends&acquaintances) when they ask me if I have a girlfriend or when they are talking about me having a wife and/or children? So, so many choices, and none of them easy simply because people are so prejudiced against LGBT.
First of all I must say that being gay in Romania is quite difficult. Most people are quite close-minded when it comes to LGBTs. What is also true however is that most of them are just ignorant people that got the impression that all gay men/boys are limp-wristed, feminine and have a lisp + high pitched voice that want to have sex with every single man/boy they meet. This is mostly due to the media portraying them like that again and again and again. Another problem is that guys here (at least the ones still in highschool) tend to act all macho when they are around other guys. This part-of-a-pack thingy turns many of them into fearless douchebags, harrassing everyone around them and making stupid jokes about everything. Strangely, many of them, when alone, are actually quite nice and intelligent.
Now, on to the more personal stuff. There are lots of guys in school who harrass me (usually just verbally. Never more than a nudge), calling me gay and fag and all those shiny words. Of course, they only do that when in groups of at least 2. Thankfully, they are not from my class. Lucky for me, most of my classmates are cool (god knows what I would have gone thru if I had bullies in my class). But I'm almost afraid to go inside the class of friends from a parallel class, because I just KNOW someone will say something nasty. Even if I ignore me, it still hurts me a little bit on the inside. It's nice however to see that, from time to time, someone shuts them up (usually the friend I'm visitting, but once or twice it happened that some random girl told them to stfu). The way I walk, talk and gesture makes people think I'm gay. I believe. It's as if I bleep like mad on everyone's gaydar, lol!
As I said, I've only come out to two of my closest friends (except for my internet friends), both girls. I'm not sure, but I think that most of my male friends will be at least taken aback if I told them. As I previously noted, they will probably think I'll pounce them and start humping them right then and there, or at least that I'm wishing for that to happen. I can think of one or two who might not react badly, but it's still really hard to tell them, especially since I find, well, fancy one of them. He's just too cute not to fancy!
I live with my parents and my brother. I get along really well with mom+bro and quite well with dad. I'm pretty sure my bro will be okay with me being gay, but I'm not sure about mom and dad is definitely going to go nuts. Well, tbh, my bro most probably knows already that I'm gay, mainly because he caught me, uhm, well, having some fun once while I was alone. But he never mentioned it.
I kept hinting mom that I'm gay and, until recently, I was almost sure she was totally okay with it, almost encouraging me to open up. Now however, I think she might take it bad, at least initially. Why? A few weeks back, after me, bro and her finished lunch, bro asked her,at some point, what she thinks about gay couples that want to have children. She thought about it for a bit, then said that she has to think about it some more and that she'll answer later. Couple mins pass and bro goes to his room, I ask mom if she decided yet and she said something like "No, I'm not sure yet. I think I'm okay with it, even though gay people make me feel a bit distressed." It was a bit shocking for me, since I thought she was okay with them.
I've also dropped some hints to my brother. We discussed about how many people think me and my best friend are together (the one I came out two who took it bad at first). My brother said that we might be in a relationship one day, who knows, to which I calmly replied "No.". He wondered why, and I told him that there is a reason why we won't be together and that it's something related to me, and left it at that.
So, now I'm at sort of a stand still (a one man stand still, is that even possible?). I do now know what to do next. Should I come out to my bro first, then to my family (with his support)? Should I come out to more of my friends and/or my classmates? Should I wait until I meet someone and, once in a relationship, come out to family/friends, only coming out to my closest female friends? Should I keep lying/dodging the question "Are you gay or something?" (and similar ones; lying in case of acquaintances, dodging in case of friends because I absolutely loathe lying to my friends)? Should I just calmly answer with the truth to these questions? Should I interrupt and correct people (usually family or family friends&acquaintances) when they ask me if I have a girlfriend or when they are talking about me having a wife and/or children? So, so many choices, and none of them easy simply because people are so prejudiced against LGBT.
you have a really good point. the LGBT community needs people like you!
the gay parade is ridiculous! why does it have to have half naked people rubbing their butts everywhere?
why can't it be just a parade where there's awesome music, good food and fun games?
although i highly doubt my parents will hate me if i am gay (they're religious but very accepting)
but they would picture all the obscenities of such parades....
i really miss the old LGBT where everyone had some kind of sophistication.
the gay parade is ridiculous! why does it have to have half naked people rubbing their butts everywhere?
why can't it be just a parade where there's awesome music, good food and fun games?
although i highly doubt my parents will hate me if i am gay (they're religious but very accepting)
but they would picture all the obscenities of such parades....
i really miss the old LGBT where everyone had some kind of sophistication.
I know exactly what you're talking about.
Each year a friend of mine is all like "You gonna walk in the pride parade this year?" and I reply "They gonna get rid of the leather freaks and the guy wearing a fucking diaper and nothing else? No? Then we'll talk again next year."
If you can't keep your own damn house clean, don't expect me to sit around in it...
Each year a friend of mine is all like "You gonna walk in the pride parade this year?" and I reply "They gonna get rid of the leather freaks and the guy wearing a fucking diaper and nothing else? No? Then we'll talk again next year."
If you can't keep your own damn house clean, don't expect me to sit around in it...
I would say pushing a religion into a child's face when they're young and impressionable would count as indoctrination though.. Before they're able to decide things for themselves. Like my friend, he is thee lamest christian ever. Doesn't really care for it at all now that he's older, but there's still that small part inside of him that's scared of things like hell because of the young age that he was introduced to religion.
Keep in mind, this child is being forced to attend a church that openly protests at the funerals of self-identified homosexuals. The only reason Marcus's group is doing ANYTHING to them is because of their direct action against a vulnerable family simply because they believed he "went to hell."
I'd say this group probably exists closer to a cult-like status than your basic church. The Westboro Baptist Church might be legally recognized as one, but the way it treats its members and family is so extreme, and their beliefs so radical, and their actions against vulnerable people and families so extreme, one must logically conclude that critical thinking and freedom of choice are not being taught there.
Same goes for this church that Marcus is returning protest to.
I'd say this group probably exists closer to a cult-like status than your basic church. The Westboro Baptist Church might be legally recognized as one, but the way it treats its members and family is so extreme, and their beliefs so radical, and their actions against vulnerable people and families so extreme, one must logically conclude that critical thinking and freedom of choice are not being taught there.
Same goes for this church that Marcus is returning protest to.
The catholic doctrine is so much more then those two points, those are the two that most non-Catholics hear the most about though. I still believe in the apostals creed and many of its other teachings. I don't think its for any one person to say "you aren't" something simply because you don't follow everything to a T. I know plenty of Catholics that realize some of the doctrine is archaic, such as condom or contraception usage..though I admit I'm quite alone in my pro-gay-marraige.
I also think Catholics, like most Christians, are doomed by zealots of our religion to be painted as hateful and close minded, when many of us are quite open minded and really just want to have our religion and eat our cake too (in this case, a gay marriage cake.) But you also won't find many of the open minded christian/Catholics speaking up for the exact reason of our religious believes being questioned. :(
I really do wish and hope the best for gay marriage to be passed. Everyone deserves the right to be happy with their loved one.
I also think Catholics, like most Christians, are doomed by zealots of our religion to be painted as hateful and close minded, when many of us are quite open minded and really just want to have our religion and eat our cake too (in this case, a gay marriage cake.) But you also won't find many of the open minded christian/Catholics speaking up for the exact reason of our religious believes being questioned. :(
I really do wish and hope the best for gay marriage to be passed. Everyone deserves the right to be happy with their loved one.
Full disclosure: I was born and raised Catholic, though due to shuffling around between schools a lot I never even reached my first communion.
I'm very happy that most Catholics don't follow the official current doctrine. And actually, a majority of Catholics do support marriage equality, from some polls I heard about.
I really really wish you and other Catholics would stand up to the church hierarchy and either help make some change, or leave in favor of a "better" church like UU.
I'm very happy that most Catholics don't follow the official current doctrine. And actually, a majority of Catholics do support marriage equality, from some polls I heard about.
I really really wish you and other Catholics would stand up to the church hierarchy and either help make some change, or leave in favor of a "better" church like UU.
Oh man, you need one of those shirts "I survived Catholic school". I wasn't raised Catholic, which might be partially why I'm so lenient. I married into it and ended up falling in love with the religion and converting.
Sadly, I think most Catholics are in too much 'awe' of the current hierarchy to do anything about it. I miss John Paul II. I think he was more with the times then the current pope.
The church has to change at some point. It can't stay in the past and expect to keep followers.
Best wishes. <3
Sadly, I think most Catholics are in too much 'awe' of the current hierarchy to do anything about it. I miss John Paul II. I think he was more with the times then the current pope.
The church has to change at some point. It can't stay in the past and expect to keep followers.
Best wishes. <3
Actually my experiences in Catholic schools were quite positive. Going to them from public schools nearly eliminated the bullying I got. But in no way do I attribute that to catholicism; it was likely more a product of expensive tuition weeding out all the poor kids, and thus kids from fucked up homes.
I don't mean to sound rude or anything, but what in the world is there to fall in love with?? Sure there are some pretty buildings, but I really don't see the appeal. Especially for somebody to convert TO it
Best wishes back. I wouldn't mind some good discussion on the matter!
I don't mean to sound rude or anything, but what in the world is there to fall in love with?? Sure there are some pretty buildings, but I really don't see the appeal. Especially for somebody to convert TO it
Best wishes back. I wouldn't mind some good discussion on the matter!
I know you don't mean to sound rude, but it kind of is coming off as that...I'm not a sensitive person but when someone says why in the world would you believe that/what is there to like about that? it's kind of insulting.
Catholicism, despite all the fucking crazies, is a religion that promotes science and religion going along with science (I've lived in four different states and another country, and visited family in at least five other states, and found this to be true in every catholic church I've gone to save for two that were VERY old fashioned). It values personal inflection and ones' own relationship with God. It emphasizes people reach their own relationship with God, and that their own self discovery and reflections with God outweigh some of the more basic, archaic teachings of the church (such as things in the old testament, outdated things etc). I won't lie, the bible is pretty ridiculous. It's full of contradictions and different counts of different peoples' stories. That's why I don't consider the bible holy. It isn't a step by step process (I don't know really any catholic or any other religious person who looks at it in the literal sense of that way) and more of a guidelines about how to be a good person. Despite all the zealots and old fashioned people, the catholic church is actually very accepting as per other religions (baptists thinking all non baptists go to hell, mormons thinking only a set number of seats in heaven, muslim teaching telling them to try to convert everyone else) despite everything you hear. In the church I go to, the priest himself said he thinks that gay marriage shouldn't be a problem. Some of the people most involved in the church I go to (it's a fairly large church, too, over 3k people) are openly and proudly gay. There are people who are, of course very close minded. There are people like me who are very open and supportive of the LGBT community. The majority are just kind of passive about it (like my parents) and don't really agree with it, but have no problem with people being that way.
Catholicism, despite all the fucking crazies, is a religion that promotes science and religion going along with science (I've lived in four different states and another country, and visited family in at least five other states, and found this to be true in every catholic church I've gone to save for two that were VERY old fashioned). It values personal inflection and ones' own relationship with God. It emphasizes people reach their own relationship with God, and that their own self discovery and reflections with God outweigh some of the more basic, archaic teachings of the church (such as things in the old testament, outdated things etc). I won't lie, the bible is pretty ridiculous. It's full of contradictions and different counts of different peoples' stories. That's why I don't consider the bible holy. It isn't a step by step process (I don't know really any catholic or any other religious person who looks at it in the literal sense of that way) and more of a guidelines about how to be a good person. Despite all the zealots and old fashioned people, the catholic church is actually very accepting as per other religions (baptists thinking all non baptists go to hell, mormons thinking only a set number of seats in heaven, muslim teaching telling them to try to convert everyone else) despite everything you hear. In the church I go to, the priest himself said he thinks that gay marriage shouldn't be a problem. Some of the people most involved in the church I go to (it's a fairly large church, too, over 3k people) are openly and proudly gay. There are people who are, of course very close minded. There are people like me who are very open and supportive of the LGBT community. The majority are just kind of passive about it (like my parents) and don't really agree with it, but have no problem with people being that way.
The way you word it is. I have zero problem if people ask my what I believe or why, but if you approach it like 'why would you ever believe that because it has nothing to offer' which insinuates you think it's silly/useless (which it may be to you, but that's not the point), it's insulting.
I just said word for word why it was insulting. I have zero problems it someone questions my beliefs. I do it all the time. It's the way you said it that was sort of insulting to me. And I agree, I don't think catholics can do anything better/worse just for simply being catholic. Religion doesn't define someone at all. Religion is a personal thing, someone's relationship with what they believe to be a higher entity. That is why it's insulting to make it out like it has nothing to offer to people or doesn't have its good sides. You don't like it, I'm cool with that. But to word it the way you do is the thing that really caught me off guard. THAT is what I said was insulting, not the content but the way it was given
I understand that it was the way I worded it that insulted you. But what about my wording insulted you?
And it appears you just contradicted yourself.
"And I agree, I don't think catholics can do anything better/worse just for simply being catholic"
vs
"...it's insulting to make it out like it has nothing to offer to people or doesn't have its good sides."
In the first statement, you're basically saying that catholicism doesn't change anything. But in the second statement, you say it's insulting to say that catholicism doesn't offer anything or have good ideas. How do you reconcile the two?
And it appears you just contradicted yourself.
"And I agree, I don't think catholics can do anything better/worse just for simply being catholic"
vs
"...it's insulting to make it out like it has nothing to offer to people or doesn't have its good sides."
In the first statement, you're basically saying that catholicism doesn't change anything. But in the second statement, you say it's insulting to say that catholicism doesn't offer anything or have good ideas. How do you reconcile the two?
I've said about three times you made it seem like there is no reason ever for someone to like religion, and that in itself was insulting.
Religion or lack of does not make someone better or change what they do or can do. HOWEVER, it can offer personal growth, experience, and opportunities for people on a more personal, self level. Just like painting for some people can offer that. Or for others meditation or yoga can do that. People who do those aren't better than those who do not do those things, but it offers some personal benefit whether physical, emotional, or spiritual. Please, stop trying to make this out into some huge debate and pick straws that aren't there...
Religion or lack of does not make someone better or change what they do or can do. HOWEVER, it can offer personal growth, experience, and opportunities for people on a more personal, self level. Just like painting for some people can offer that. Or for others meditation or yoga can do that. People who do those aren't better than those who do not do those things, but it offers some personal benefit whether physical, emotional, or spiritual. Please, stop trying to make this out into some huge debate and pick straws that aren't there...
It's not my problem that my viewpoint insults you. I argue that there is absolutely no reason ever for someone to like religion because I see it to be the truth. There is nothing that religion offers that can only be found in religion. And given that theist/supernatural religions cannot stand the test of evidence, nobody should use religion as a reason for anything whatsoever.
Again. Not my problem if my rational viewpoint somehow insults you. Perhaps that's a defense mechanism that you need to further examine.
Again. Not my problem if my rational viewpoint somehow insults you. Perhaps that's a defense mechanism that you need to further examine.
Or maybe you should stop being such a rude, bigoted, and narrow minded person who can't admit that others get something out of religion and stop seeing your personal opinions as fact. I don't care that you don't like religion, I fully can understand why people feel that way. You said you didn't mean to insult, and I said it came off as insulting, and offered my opinions. Though now I'm relatively sure from your behavior here that you could not care less about the feelings of others. I'm not going to sit here and have someone passive aggressively insult me and try to badger me into some debate just to disprove my religion.
I do have to agree the wording you used is a bit insulting, even if you put "I don't' mean to sound rude" in front of it. You basically are expecting everyone to be 100% accepting of the things you want them to be accepting of, but then are completely closed minded and very judgmental in the same breath towards another group of people.
I enjoy the religion for the same reason most people enjoy their religions. The rituals, the sermons, the songs, and that after all of the different types of Christianity I've tried, Catholicism is the only one where when I walk into the sanctuary I actually FEEL God.
Anyway. I personally don't want to discuss this anymore on Rukis page. Thanks for a good discussion :)
I enjoy the religion for the same reason most people enjoy their religions. The rituals, the sermons, the songs, and that after all of the different types of Christianity I've tried, Catholicism is the only one where when I walk into the sanctuary I actually FEEL God.
Anyway. I personally don't want to discuss this anymore on Rukis page. Thanks for a good discussion :)
I don't think the point is for them to be "intimidating", as they're not trying to start a physical altercation, but rather get -their- viewpoint across in the same medium they did.
Whether or not that's the "right" way to handle such a conflict, however, is still very much a matter of debate.
Whether or not that's the "right" way to handle such a conflict, however, is still very much a matter of debate.
Dude, I'm sorry, but every single one of your posts makes me worried for the gay rights movement. It's messages like that that your opponents will use to show how terrible you really are.
Fighting for your rights is admirable, and I'd never discourage you from it. But you're borderline threatening at this point. Don't make yourself out to be the villain here.
Fighting for your rights is admirable, and I'd never discourage you from it. But you're borderline threatening at this point. Don't make yourself out to be the villain here.
I didn't say to sugar coat anything. I didn't even say to tone it down. But when you start making threats like that, you're no better than your opponents. You can't claim to be victimized if you turn around and do the same thing back to them. They'll just use it as proof of their message, and that does nothing but hurt your cause.
In short,fight for your rights, but don't stoop to their level.
In short,fight for your rights, but don't stoop to their level.
I've been protesting in the streets for various causes for over 20 years. Some like my message and some don't. I've I've gotten the shit kicked out of me, I'm been locked up, and even spit on but I've never backed down, given in, or quit all together. It's cost me jobs and caused issues with my family in the past. But I'll never stop! In the end all of this will be justified even if it's not clear at this point.
No, I understand what your saying just fine. I'm just telling you that I've been doing what I'm doing your whole life (if your profile info is correct.) You and others might see me as the bad guy, and so be ii if you do; but I'll never lay down and allow others to win with out fighting to my last breath!
Oh I'm sure you don't! I'm almost certain your one of those types who walk around with a chip on there shoulder. Making snide comments directed at ativictes proves that. ;) Anyway you have your self a lovely day as I'm done with you and your friend with down syndrome above. ^_^
Personal insult involving something that someone is born with being used as a euphamism for stupidity? Oh my.
Nope, this isn't a double standard at all.
Even if you don't read this, I'd like it put out there: you're living in a new age. The rules of engagement have changed. If you can't adapt your tactics, then your cause has no hope.
Nope, this isn't a double standard at all.
Even if you don't read this, I'd like it put out there: you're living in a new age. The rules of engagement have changed. If you can't adapt your tactics, then your cause has no hope.
Read more closely then. I don't go around and tell people life's ice cream and cookies simply because it's not. The world is not black and white like some here think. If people can't handle being talked to honestly and without bullshit mixed in I'm sorry.
I'm done here now if no one else has any future objections.
Cheers!
I'm done here now if no one else has any future objections.
Cheers!
No love. I never once disallowed another's input. I may not of agreed with what they had to say and may not even reply back with a direct answer, but I've not stopped anyone as you claiming. The only ones I've called kids were in fact children. And furthermore it was the name calling or bad attitudes such as your's right now that gave me reason to call them such. Understand?
> 'Again kiddo I'm older, wiser, and have been through much more than you have I can assure you!'
If that's not condescending and conceited, I don't know what is. Never mind it. You clearly are one one those people who disregard other peoples' advice, experiences, and opinions just because they are not as old as you are. Which is really a shame, because you don't have to be old to have good input, ideas, or advice.
If that's not condescending and conceited, I don't know what is. Never mind it. You clearly are one one those people who disregard other peoples' advice, experiences, and opinions just because they are not as old as you are. Which is really a shame, because you don't have to be old to have good input, ideas, or advice.
that thrith panel is going to be an instant hit if you animate it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FK_CKtYCRIc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FK_CKtYCRIc
I love the lion family, they look great!
I was also going to say that the eagle dude looks great, but on closer inspection; is the eagle wearing a dress in the bottom pannel? If so; awesome that you didn't cutsey-up her kickass beak just for the sake of trying to make her more 'feminine'!
I was also going to say that the eagle dude looks great, but on closer inspection; is the eagle wearing a dress in the bottom pannel? If so; awesome that you didn't cutsey-up her kickass beak just for the sake of trying to make her more 'feminine'!
Errrrr... White balance has nothing to do with the glare on the camera. White balance makes sure that colours are captured accurately.
For nerdy sounding video stuff, I recommend
What are we like on media?
It's a fresh card, so about two hours.
Is exposure okay?
We're clipping a bit in the highlights, but skin is at 60%
You can even go really simple.
Did you charge up the battery?
Yup. Fresh off the charger.
Glare and white balance have no relation to each other. There are much cooler sounding words that you can use that make sense.
You asked a cop about cpcs in cruelty, ask a video guy about a camera.
For nerdy sounding video stuff, I recommend
What are we like on media?
It's a fresh card, so about two hours.
Is exposure okay?
We're clipping a bit in the highlights, but skin is at 60%
You can even go really simple.
Did you charge up the battery?
Yup. Fresh off the charger.
Glare and white balance have no relation to each other. There are much cooler sounding words that you can use that make sense.
You asked a cop about cpcs in cruelty, ask a video guy about a camera.
I actually went to, and graduated from, film school, and we white-balanced whenever we were dealing with direct sunlight, because sunlight tends to filter the entire image towards blue. Sunlight = glare, in this particular conversation. . . a literal glare would have more to do with an F stop, but I figured that might be a bit TOO technical for some folks, and best not to nerd out.
Okay, first off, wow. I didn't know you went to film school.
Second. Glare is light reflecting off of a shiny object and into the lens of the camera affecting contrast and exposure, not colour. It just irks as it's a common line used by script writers to make someone sound like a knowledgeable person.
Also, F stop is too nerdy, but white balance is fine? They're about the same amount of nerdy to me, but okay. You're the writer, not me.
Second. Glare is light reflecting off of a shiny object and into the lens of the camera affecting contrast and exposure, not colour. It just irks as it's a common line used by script writers to make someone sound like a knowledgeable person.
Also, F stop is too nerdy, but white balance is fine? They're about the same amount of nerdy to me, but okay. You're the writer, not me.
Of course all of this is pretty moot, considering the camera he's using is not some PD150 he'd be manually adjusting (although it's been five years since I've been in film school, so they might be HORRIBLY out-of-date now). I based it on a little shit camera mostly used by tourists. Odds are, everything's on auto.
Honestly, I didn't think too much about it. . . and Marcus is actually not supposed to know what he's talking about. Notice he asked about the mic. . . like *anyone* uses anything but a cordless mic anymore. To be honest, I didn't think anyone would care :P
I was an animation major. I took four years of hardcore film classes, though. . . requirement for the major. I'll admit, at this point, a lot of it has probably seeped away, but it was certainly an. . . experience. The part about film work I honestly enjoyed the most was sound design and editing, honestly. Film shoots drove me crazy, cuz of all the technical jargon. And we usually shot with 250s, which are heavy as BALLS. I'd usually puss out and just handle the boom :P
I was an animation major. I took four years of hardcore film classes, though. . . requirement for the major. I'll admit, at this point, a lot of it has probably seeped away, but it was certainly an. . . experience. The part about film work I honestly enjoyed the most was sound design and editing, honestly. Film shoots drove me crazy, cuz of all the technical jargon. And we usually shot with 250s, which are heavy as BALLS. I'd usually puss out and just handle the boom :P
So, I'ma take a risk and say that the look on that family's face hurts my heart. I might have a habbit of reading to much into thngs, but I don't think that they are the kind of people who walk around trying to bash homosexuals, that's their bastard of a pastor. However, they are the ones about to be confronted about it, have their beliefs questioned, attacked, and be made to feel unsafe. And you know, as wrong as what the pastor did was, what gives these people the right to perpetuate it? Do they not realize that fear only begets more fear, blood only begets more blood? If someone attacks your beliefs, and you up the antie and attack them back, are you not only handing them ammunition to once again launch at you? This whole page made me hurt on so many levels... I hope, one day, that things I write can have this sort of effect on other people... Bravo!
I have to say all the other stories Rukis has done tended to have major lighting and tones throughout most of the story, like Red Lantern for example has alot of scenes that are in dim lit places with warm tones, or outdoor night scenes, which are a nice touch but this one is interesting since the scenes are very brightly and naturally lit, gives it a bit of a different feel and makes me feel like the story could go anywhere The look feels a bit more clean and modern
They would retain the moral high ground by not doing this, but I understand why they're doing it. But they have to know there's a good chance someone will end up physically injured before all is said and done and that's a sad thing.
Also, been seeing a lot of vests lately. Are those...back?
Also, been seeing a lot of vests lately. Are those...back?
Okay, this comment actually really did make me laugh out loud.
Interesting to see a bird at all in this world... I'll just pretend I didn't see mammal traits on an avian. They're simply vestigial flight muscles. Thaaaat's the ticket.
Keep up the updates, I'm enjoying the dual stories you have going! I didn't get a chance to go to con and pick up Red Lantern, so it's still new to me as pages are posted.
Interesting to see a bird at all in this world... I'll just pretend I didn't see mammal traits on an avian. They're simply vestigial flight muscles. Thaaaat's the ticket.
Keep up the updates, I'm enjoying the dual stories you have going! I didn't get a chance to go to con and pick up Red Lantern, so it's still new to me as pages are posted.
Oh where do I even start? It's so rare that you see such a wonderful depiction of true human drama in a furry comic: truly masterful, Rukis!
Yeah peaceful protests really take so much more courage! Dr. Martin Luther King is one of my personal heroes just because of how much guts it took to stand up for equality in the face of such violence. Hell Marcus is a better man than I: I'd be hard pressed not to kick the **** outta the WBC if we met.
Yeah peaceful protests really take so much more courage! Dr. Martin Luther King is one of my personal heroes just because of how much guts it took to stand up for equality in the face of such violence. Hell Marcus is a better man than I: I'd be hard pressed not to kick the **** outta the WBC if we met.
This is true, and I think that people forget that for the most part everyone wants the same things in life. The dark vestiges of society are far more interesting, so the media glorifies them. This singular church in the real world gets all the coverage it wants, validating its actions, spreading its propaganda, and furthering the cause of inciting violence. Groups like this wish for upheaval. They thrive on it as they believe the destruction of mankind is a means to an end. So if they can cause violence to further martyr themselves, all the better.
In reality, this is a very small group, amongst many other small groups, of various religions across the world. The majority of people, even if not agreeing with other people in their societies, tolerate one another. I live in small-town, rural Texas. Despite how right-wing and ignorant people often tend to be, there is a lot less hate and intolerance for gays than one might think. Sure there's that disgust and macho-ism among men. There's pompousness and arrogance, chest thumping and proving that one is a man. Perhaps in my corner of the world, despite how evangelical and Bible belt it might be, there's a growing tolerance and philosophy of live and let live. The irony is you're a lot more likely to inspire the ire of your fellow citizens here for being a Democrat than being gay. So if they're all over you for something, it's not because of your sexual orientation. Not that being openly gay would probably feel very comfortable, but at least I doubt anyone would have to worry about being beaten and killed for it.
The majority of people, I will again say, don't seek to hate others. They just want to co-exist. Lumping everyone into this one group, it's ironic to me. How many times have we been told that not all Muslims are like those who belong to terrorist groups? Then how is it we can't reflect on that and realize that not all Christians are fanatical? There's a great deal of community activism and support from most churches. They do so much that people never give credit for and at best take for granted. I'm not going to say there's not intolerance and discrimination. I just believe it's been blown out of proportion. There are so many branches of the Christian faith that it's almost impossible to point your finger anyway. It's as dynamic and varied as the world it exists in. There's no one "Christian" religion you can define. It's like the sands of a beach. They're all part of the same beach, but some are different colors, sizes, and shapes. They coexist separately and as a whole at the same time. You can't point to the beach and say it's all the same as one single pebble strewn with seagull droppings. Sure they're all grains of sand, but each is unique. Just as people are. Preconceptions on either side help no one. Believing that all Christians are a certain way, think a certain way, act a certain way; this is no different than the perception people have that they are similarly discriminated against. If all gays are treated as one thing, one people without uniqueness, completely defined by their sexuality, people are appalled. How is this any different?
In reality, this is a very small group, amongst many other small groups, of various religions across the world. The majority of people, even if not agreeing with other people in their societies, tolerate one another. I live in small-town, rural Texas. Despite how right-wing and ignorant people often tend to be, there is a lot less hate and intolerance for gays than one might think. Sure there's that disgust and macho-ism among men. There's pompousness and arrogance, chest thumping and proving that one is a man. Perhaps in my corner of the world, despite how evangelical and Bible belt it might be, there's a growing tolerance and philosophy of live and let live. The irony is you're a lot more likely to inspire the ire of your fellow citizens here for being a Democrat than being gay. So if they're all over you for something, it's not because of your sexual orientation. Not that being openly gay would probably feel very comfortable, but at least I doubt anyone would have to worry about being beaten and killed for it.
The majority of people, I will again say, don't seek to hate others. They just want to co-exist. Lumping everyone into this one group, it's ironic to me. How many times have we been told that not all Muslims are like those who belong to terrorist groups? Then how is it we can't reflect on that and realize that not all Christians are fanatical? There's a great deal of community activism and support from most churches. They do so much that people never give credit for and at best take for granted. I'm not going to say there's not intolerance and discrimination. I just believe it's been blown out of proportion. There are so many branches of the Christian faith that it's almost impossible to point your finger anyway. It's as dynamic and varied as the world it exists in. There's no one "Christian" religion you can define. It's like the sands of a beach. They're all part of the same beach, but some are different colors, sizes, and shapes. They coexist separately and as a whole at the same time. You can't point to the beach and say it's all the same as one single pebble strewn with seagull droppings. Sure they're all grains of sand, but each is unique. Just as people are. Preconceptions on either side help no one. Believing that all Christians are a certain way, think a certain way, act a certain way; this is no different than the perception people have that they are similarly discriminated against. If all gays are treated as one thing, one people without uniqueness, completely defined by their sexuality, people are appalled. How is this any different?
SO!!!!!!.......No such thing as bullying this day?........
chuckles!!!!!!!!.......wrong again. For the longest times(usually bc I'm so focused with my school work and I thought ignoring trolls would make them stop and move on)
I had been allowing my peers in my local technical community college to harass me for being gay and it got to the point where I almost got involved into a physical confrontation(me refusing to fight)
let me tell you there are still bigots out there especially small minded people from small hamlets, in rural areas who were raised as farmboys that are so against gays you can see they're indoctrination by their parents to hate.I know this bc I lived in a very small town in manitoba when I was young and its difficult to grow up different. (of course mind you at that time I wasn't quite sure who I was)
Truth is im so happy for one of my peers from the other engineering group who witnessed this and complained to the dean.
No matter how simple the argument is to the college this is serious shit.
Truthfully, you can't really change the attitude of these bigots that much.......but you got to make them understand through they're peanut sized minds that this isn't the small town they grew up in. You have to conform with everyone in this college and we wont allow this shit from you. keep doing it and you'll be forcefully expelled.
gotta hit them where it hurts. And thats they're ability to carry out such hate. limit they're ability to influence and they''ll crawl back into they're mouse hole(sorry rodents I didn't mean to offend !!!^ ^)
I don't think what rukis is doing is bad but like all rights that are fought for it, has a price. Every action has it's consequence. No one said it was gonna be easy.
chuckles!!!!!!!!.......wrong again. For the longest times(usually bc I'm so focused with my school work and I thought ignoring trolls would make them stop and move on)
I had been allowing my peers in my local technical community college to harass me for being gay and it got to the point where I almost got involved into a physical confrontation(me refusing to fight)
let me tell you there are still bigots out there especially small minded people from small hamlets, in rural areas who were raised as farmboys that are so against gays you can see they're indoctrination by their parents to hate.I know this bc I lived in a very small town in manitoba when I was young and its difficult to grow up different. (of course mind you at that time I wasn't quite sure who I was)
Truth is im so happy for one of my peers from the other engineering group who witnessed this and complained to the dean.
No matter how simple the argument is to the college this is serious shit.
Truthfully, you can't really change the attitude of these bigots that much.......but you got to make them understand through they're peanut sized minds that this isn't the small town they grew up in. You have to conform with everyone in this college and we wont allow this shit from you. keep doing it and you'll be forcefully expelled.
gotta hit them where it hurts. And thats they're ability to carry out such hate. limit they're ability to influence and they''ll crawl back into they're mouse hole(sorry rodents I didn't mean to offend !!!^ ^)
I don't think what rukis is doing is bad but like all rights that are fought for it, has a price. Every action has it's consequence. No one said it was gonna be easy.
Heyyyy I was raised on a farm :( and I'll have you knoooow that I am graduating with Honors :p hehe butttt you are right in high school bullies are king and the only way to make them stop is physically. I know this because I was bullied all the time till junior year when my bully wrapped his hands around my throat and started squeezing hard. No one knew that I had been taking Self Defense Classes. I pushed him off and he feel to the ground pretty hard. It wasn't much but it was enough that the entire Senior year I was a "cool kid" and no one messed with me.
However in college it's not like that AT ALL our college has an LGBT and a DLP fraternity, all gay frat, on campus. Their are religious groups on campus and they try to pass out Bibles and stuff but nobody bullies anyone. If you do not only does the Dean get involved but the On Campus Cops get involved too. Either stop bulling or have Hate Crime on your Permanent record! Just try and find a job after having that on there. But I digress it's getting better everywhere and I don't think it's going to be to much longer before gay and lesbian holding hands or kissing in public will be looked at the same way if a man and women were to be doing the same thing.
However in college it's not like that AT ALL our college has an LGBT and a DLP fraternity, all gay frat, on campus. Their are religious groups on campus and they try to pass out Bibles and stuff but nobody bullies anyone. If you do not only does the Dean get involved but the On Campus Cops get involved too. Either stop bulling or have Hate Crime on your Permanent record! Just try and find a job after having that on there. But I digress it's getting better everywhere and I don't think it's going to be to much longer before gay and lesbian holding hands or kissing in public will be looked at the same way if a man and women were to be doing the same thing.
you are right it's only a matter of time. And with regards to small towns I'm sorry I spoke as a generalization but I know for a fact that in
very very small towns everybody knows each other,many can get so riled up over the simplest things(gossip at it's best.
But I'm also aware they're are other factors that are involved that can predispose a town to being predominately homophobic and fearful of whats different.
Age of group(many were bitter and very fundamental christian elders), very small racial minorities, lack of proper education and class, religion plays a big part(especially since there quite a substantial amt of hardcore menonites[not saying all are hardcore to the book lol)
but yeah thats the thing about small towns.
Very little room to breathe in if majority of individual people are acute minded
very very small towns everybody knows each other,many can get so riled up over the simplest things(gossip at it's best.
But I'm also aware they're are other factors that are involved that can predispose a town to being predominately homophobic and fearful of whats different.
Age of group(many were bitter and very fundamental christian elders), very small racial minorities, lack of proper education and class, religion plays a big part(especially since there quite a substantial amt of hardcore menonites[not saying all are hardcore to the book lol)
but yeah thats the thing about small towns.
Very little room to breathe in if majority of individual people are acute minded
they were crazy to banish and toss out their own members. there is a video of a young lady who was exiled/excomunicated for being different.For voicing her own mind within the westboro baptist church.
The only other group I can think of that is just as segregating and hateful as West-boro and perhaps is worse in a sense that they instill fear mongering tactics is the church of Scientology(Again the hardcore leaders and radical members)
Theirs a reason Anonymous went after them and they protested against them.
I think we need to wait and see what happens next to witness if this protest will succeed in carrying their message or will result in a giant clusterfuck.
Either way it is opening a giant can of worms. It's all a matter of playing your cards right.
"let he who is without sin, cast the first stone"
The only other group I can think of that is just as segregating and hateful as West-boro and perhaps is worse in a sense that they instill fear mongering tactics is the church of Scientology(Again the hardcore leaders and radical members)
Theirs a reason Anonymous went after them and they protested against them.
I think we need to wait and see what happens next to witness if this protest will succeed in carrying their message or will result in a giant clusterfuck.
Either way it is opening a giant can of worms. It's all a matter of playing your cards right.
"let he who is without sin, cast the first stone"
Go in any Southern Baptist church and tell them "I'm gay" and let me know how it goes. The fact is the large majority of Christianity is severely against homosexuality, as they see it as both sinful and see it as an abomination to there god. Yes there are a few churches that support the gay community. But don't be fooled! Many agree with the message of WBBC even if they admit to it or not.
Anonymous Writer: Yeah, it happens all the time where I live. My best friend opened up to me about it and then the rest of us. We still welcomed him with open arms as a brother. Mind you, I'm not saying that what you said doesn't happen, just that I've yet to see it happen.
"He who has no sin cast the first stone." (John 8:1-11) So we don't care what you've done or "what you are". Yes, we went to a Tennessee/Mississippi (aka Southern) Baptist Churches too. It's funny how atheists expect us to act like the Pharisees and scary how many "Christians" are Pharisees themselves.
Cobalt: I've been to all kinds of churches, but one thing always remains the same, they are some of the nicest people I've ever met. No matter what I believe, they always sit down and talk with me personally and without harsh judgement. My partner is one and my mother and brother are Christians as well. I'm more agnostic when it comes to religion, but I look at the people that I have met and frankly they're overall nice people. Much nicer than most "atheist" that I met. (As as side note: In fact, I don't even like calling the mean atheists "atheists" because that's insulting to some of my good friends who happen to be atheists themselves. So I prefer to call them "Anti-theists".)
"He who has no sin cast the first stone." (John 8:1-11) So we don't care what you've done or "what you are". Yes, we went to a Tennessee/Mississippi (aka Southern) Baptist Churches too. It's funny how atheists expect us to act like the Pharisees and scary how many "Christians" are Pharisees themselves.
Cobalt: I've been to all kinds of churches, but one thing always remains the same, they are some of the nicest people I've ever met. No matter what I believe, they always sit down and talk with me personally and without harsh judgement. My partner is one and my mother and brother are Christians as well. I'm more agnostic when it comes to religion, but I look at the people that I have met and frankly they're overall nice people. Much nicer than most "atheist" that I met. (As as side note: In fact, I don't even like calling the mean atheists "atheists" because that's insulting to some of my good friends who happen to be atheists themselves. So I prefer to call them "Anti-theists".)
Yes, but any good christian would actually read their scripture where it basically says let God do the judging. "Judge lest you be judged". "Love the sin, not the sinner", etc. etc.
Though this brings the point of why anyone feels the need to walk into anywhere and proclaim their sexuality.
BRB going to Walmart to scream "I'm straight".
Though this brings the point of why anyone feels the need to walk into anywhere and proclaim their sexuality.
BRB going to Walmart to scream "I'm straight".
AW: Actually, it's "Love the sinner, hate the sin." The Bible says this over and over again. "For all have sinned", "while we were still sinners, God forgave", and so forth. (Romans 5:7-9, John 3:16) Sorry, it's a bad habit of mine to "correct people".
CR: I'm helping him work with that, but he's right.
Both: Thank you.
CR: I'm helping him work with that, but he's right.
Both: Thank you.
Very well drawn page, and the storyline couldn't be better. I don't understand why people are disappointed in Marc, though. He's standing up for the morals and the cause that he believes in, and doing so in a non violent way. That's more than a lot of people can say, and it's certainly not a bad thing. I do agree he's stooping to their level, but to reference something someone said above, you'll never accomplish anything by turning a blind eye to the matter. Sometimes stooping to the oppositions level is unavoidable, because they do things to make it unavoidable.
But I'm biased as all hell, I've been protesting various things before I was even a year old.
But I'm biased as all hell, I've been protesting various things before I was even a year old.
Aslan knocked some women up?
No but seriously, i feel so sorry for that guys' wife (assuming it's his wife of course). She looks like she's either brainwashed or just sick of all the shit he brings into their family. Either way Rukis you've done an outstanding job again. I hope you can look at this strip and feel a swelling sense of pride.
No but seriously, i feel so sorry for that guys' wife (assuming it's his wife of course). She looks like she's either brainwashed or just sick of all the shit he brings into their family. Either way Rukis you've done an outstanding job again. I hope you can look at this strip and feel a swelling sense of pride.
ok I dont think Marcus is being a dick .. I mean hes playing the same rule book as King did.. NO VIOLENCE Just words... I think showing people how HATEFUL OTHERS ARE is a better way of dealing with problems and changing minds then RIOTING and Provoking,..
To me this is the only way to change people for the better
and love the third panel WOW Lesbians joining in
To me this is the only way to change people for the better
and love the third panel WOW Lesbians joining in
Cobalt: I agree, Canius. It is the only way to change for the better is to do it peacefully.
However, this situation is different, very different. King didn't target specific people in order to provoke them either (intentional or otherwise). He marched across hundreds of miles from point A to point B in peace marches. He raised awareness simply by moving across the nation. I've seen something like this happen a few times. People have the cameras in the ready, then provoke / harass specific people until they get violent themselves. Just because only words are being used, doesn't mean that they're being completely innocent. If what I said here isn't true, then why do all of the protesters look like they're about to go to war? As my partner would say, "Pray for the best, prepare for the worse."
Sorry, it just needed to be said.
From both of us: I always love seeing your work, Rukis. It's always so real, not just art wise, but story wise too. Even in the final panel here you can see that the Lion knows what's coming and the wife is concerned as she's being hurried along. The child (as children do) has no clue what's happening. It's so beautifully done. It's worth the wait to see every single page of your work. To spend hours on a work that most people would only take three seconds to see, is worth it when it turns out as good as yours does.
However, this situation is different, very different. King didn't target specific people in order to provoke them either (intentional or otherwise). He marched across hundreds of miles from point A to point B in peace marches. He raised awareness simply by moving across the nation. I've seen something like this happen a few times. People have the cameras in the ready, then provoke / harass specific people until they get violent themselves. Just because only words are being used, doesn't mean that they're being completely innocent. If what I said here isn't true, then why do all of the protesters look like they're about to go to war? As my partner would say, "Pray for the best, prepare for the worse."
Sorry, it just needed to be said.
From both of us: I always love seeing your work, Rukis. It's always so real, not just art wise, but story wise too. Even in the final panel here you can see that the Lion knows what's coming and the wife is concerned as she's being hurried along. The child (as children do) has no clue what's happening. It's so beautifully done. It's worth the wait to see every single page of your work. To spend hours on a work that most people would only take three seconds to see, is worth it when it turns out as good as yours does.
It's interesting how many debates this comic page brought up. But reading them reminds me of something I witnessed when the voting for Prop 8 first went around.
A church group was protesting same sex marriage next to a group wanting same sex marriage. Of course, we live in a desert so its fucking hot during the day. Someone stopped by with a cooler and passed out water bottles to everyone, making sure they sat down and drank and cooled down. In the end both groups ended up talking with each other rather casually.
A church group was protesting same sex marriage next to a group wanting same sex marriage. Of course, we live in a desert so its fucking hot during the day. Someone stopped by with a cooler and passed out water bottles to everyone, making sure they sat down and drank and cooled down. In the end both groups ended up talking with each other rather casually.
not really sure where i stand on this, I wish the wife and cub could be left out of the mess, but then again I assume the woman shares the fathers views, and un;ess the kids eye's are opened, so will he eventually...sigh.
Its easy to think its hateful and wrong, a big group ganging up on that one family, until you realize that one Lion is part a far greater group, who have caused far, far grater harm.
I guess in the end id reluctantly agree with the protest as a necessary evil. Violence however is out of the question.
Once again amazing comic, im very interested to see what comes next.
Its easy to think its hateful and wrong, a big group ganging up on that one family, until you realize that one Lion is part a far greater group, who have caused far, far grater harm.
I guess in the end id reluctantly agree with the protest as a necessary evil. Violence however is out of the question.
Once again amazing comic, im very interested to see what comes next.
Ok is it just me or how I sometimes looks at things, but does Marc look female in the thrid panel, just saying, and yes I can see his muscular chest, and not boob but seriously, that outfit, couple with the fact that his body is a little feminite, and if I din't know he is a guy, I would really have mistaken him for female.
Anyway, really good work on your comic, and shit is about to hit the fan indeed, question, when you put death, it doesn't necesarily mean than the main character die right, it could be other character that die right.
Anyway, really good work on your comic, and shit is about to hit the fan indeed, question, when you put death, it doesn't necesarily mean than the main character die right, it could be other character that die right.
I love how the first things people jump to is the WBC and Christians in general. Remember people. This is a story. It can parallel to shed light on issues, but it is not saying this is who it is directly at. If it did, chances are the lawyers would be trying to get Rukis shut down as well now. (I accept that it is very similar to the actions of them, but to assume it is directly linked to or about them is wrong.)
To some extent the level of protest they are doing there makes more sense. They are dressed normally. Nothing extreme. They might have been better off trying to get Media support over just their own camera.
I am not going to rekindle all the talk about quiet, whiney gays and so on. That line needs to die off where it did above.
Coming from a country that is not America but is having their own version as the government have made claims they will drive through actual Non Religious Gay Marriage over the Civil Partnerships that had begun a few years back. Religious groups (Mostly Christian, but a bit from others as well) are making all the fuss over how it will destroy marriage and see the country looked down on by the rest of the world for lowering morals etc.
You can stand your ground and make a point, without resorting to violence unless it is thrown at you. And you can find ways around problems without throwing yourself right at the problem. To quote Bruce Lee. It is better to be like water, flow around and wear it down.
To some extent the level of protest they are doing there makes more sense. They are dressed normally. Nothing extreme. They might have been better off trying to get Media support over just their own camera.
I am not going to rekindle all the talk about quiet, whiney gays and so on. That line needs to die off where it did above.
Coming from a country that is not America but is having their own version as the government have made claims they will drive through actual Non Religious Gay Marriage over the Civil Partnerships that had begun a few years back. Religious groups (Mostly Christian, but a bit from others as well) are making all the fuss over how it will destroy marriage and see the country looked down on by the rest of the world for lowering morals etc.
You can stand your ground and make a point, without resorting to violence unless it is thrown at you. And you can find ways around problems without throwing yourself right at the problem. To quote Bruce Lee. It is better to be like water, flow around and wear it down.
Completely random and off topic question, but it's sort of been rattling around in the back of my head.
So in the Cruelty universe (and Red Lantern too for that matter but to a lesser extent) we've got all manner of sapient species who live together and apparently all evolved to a humanoid state independently (cause' I don't see these being the kind of stories where ALIENS DID IT or HUMANS MADE THEM AND THEN ALL DIED OUT BECAUSE STOOPID HY00MANZ WE JUST NEVER TALK ABOUT IT), okay, cool.
That I can handle.
What's been gnawing at me is how similar are they all biochemically? Like, obviously we haven't seen goat/lizard hybrid children or anything like that running around, but do real life dietary rules still apply? If Reis ate a chocolate bar would he become violently ill? Would a cheetah eating meat that's a day or two passed 'freshly killed' get sick from it? Can they give each other blood transfusions? Do they have to have doctors specialized on a species-to-species basis and entire suites of pharmaceutics for different genus's?
Actually, now that I've kinda brought it up do the carnivorous species still eat meat and where does it come from? Are their still four legged non-sapient versions of most animals? Do they all eat fist instead? I'm pretty damn sure they're not eating each other.
.....
Random, yes, but these kind of things nibble at me the longer I don't know...
So in the Cruelty universe (and Red Lantern too for that matter but to a lesser extent) we've got all manner of sapient species who live together and apparently all evolved to a humanoid state independently (cause' I don't see these being the kind of stories where ALIENS DID IT or HUMANS MADE THEM AND THEN ALL DIED OUT BECAUSE STOOPID HY00MANZ WE JUST NEVER TALK ABOUT IT), okay, cool.
That I can handle.
What's been gnawing at me is how similar are they all biochemically? Like, obviously we haven't seen goat/lizard hybrid children or anything like that running around, but do real life dietary rules still apply? If Reis ate a chocolate bar would he become violently ill? Would a cheetah eating meat that's a day or two passed 'freshly killed' get sick from it? Can they give each other blood transfusions? Do they have to have doctors specialized on a species-to-species basis and entire suites of pharmaceutics for different genus's?
Actually, now that I've kinda brought it up do the carnivorous species still eat meat and where does it come from? Are their still four legged non-sapient versions of most animals? Do they all eat fist instead? I'm pretty damn sure they're not eating each other.
.....
Random, yes, but these kind of things nibble at me the longer I don't know...
Well along that vein, you could ask how so many different anthropomorphic species evolved on the SAME planet without competition extinguishing most of them down to one species, over time. Remember, even humans evolved from one advanced ape that out-competed and eventually made extinct a totally *different* species of evolved ape. You could also ask how ANY vegetarian species could ever possibly achieve higher brain function without protein in their diet. Or how predator/prey species would have EVER been able to live in any society together, in harmony. Presumably at one point long ago, they *did* prey on one another. Do anthro animals keep pets? How would feral versions of VERY common animals play a role in an advanced anthropomorphic society, when civilization began, up to the present?
The bottom line is. . . there are just too many things that CANNOT be explained in a modern anthro setting, because biologically, it would never come to be. Most predators with sentient brain function would eventually evolve to a point where we wouldn't recognize them, since they would not need their natural weapons. Bipedal movement means most digitigrade species would evolve towards plantigrade feet. Not to mention there are a shit ton of species in this particular setting that have no place in a North American environment.
It's one of those things you just have to either
A. Not overthink
or
B. Form an entire setting around, and accept that it's going to be complicated, and probably NEVER scientifically realistic
The bottom line is. . . there are just too many things that CANNOT be explained in a modern anthro setting, because biologically, it would never come to be. Most predators with sentient brain function would eventually evolve to a point where we wouldn't recognize them, since they would not need their natural weapons. Bipedal movement means most digitigrade species would evolve towards plantigrade feet. Not to mention there are a shit ton of species in this particular setting that have no place in a North American environment.
It's one of those things you just have to either
A. Not overthink
or
B. Form an entire setting around, and accept that it's going to be complicated, and probably NEVER scientifically realistic
I think a lot of people are nervous because of the "death" that She promised...
For me I guess I can agree with Marcus if he is really taking the "peace" and "no Violence" vow seriously.. There is a line between "educate" and "provoke" Lets hope Marcus knows where that line is...
As per "Death " I think (1) Marcus Dies (2) Reis Dies (3) A Bystander friend dies (4) Mother dies) (I need to stop thinking about this comic...)
Did we miss the "smut" Adult scenes that were going to be put in the main comic... OOO
Other than that.. I am glad to see that a lot of us are civilized about what is going on...
For me I guess I can agree with Marcus if he is really taking the "peace" and "no Violence" vow seriously.. There is a line between "educate" and "provoke" Lets hope Marcus knows where that line is...
As per "Death " I think (1) Marcus Dies (2) Reis Dies (3) A Bystander friend dies (4) Mother dies) (I need to stop thinking about this comic...)
Did we miss the "smut" Adult scenes that were going to be put in the main comic... OOO
Other than that.. I am glad to see that a lot of us are civilized about what is going on...
Just adding my two cents in favor of this protest. I suppose that the general sense of foreboding in this comic implies that things are going to go south soon, but I'm still in favor of the general idea. I think there should be picketing of religious organizations that are actively harmful to gay rights and womens rights. If they don't like it, they can get out of politics.
I remember that I bought Cruelty from ya at MFF last year. I adore not just the characters but the over all realistic feel of the comics. I've really become a fan of modern, realistic furry-style comics and stories because of Cruelty and I'm really excited about Unconditional. I love that you've taken the level of the comic to a new level and instantly, as other people had got the correlation regarding the whole picketing the funeral thing. I find it very thoughtful that you included species and pelt in the protest. lol I always like seeing the little details and such you add into your comics, the real world thoughts that allow some of the readers to relate to it. Your furry world is pretty awesome, Rukis.
as a believer I obviously am somewhat religious but this lion is a cunt he's like a Trump in disguise about to burst everyone to pieces with his corrupted Christianity temper tantrums only a mom could like I read this a million times and it is portrayed so perfectly as a gay guy I get pist at this kinda bs it's why I walked out on Christianity now I believe in God on my own beliefs and my beliefs are being lgbtqia+ episcopalian christian seems Christians hate Episcopalians cause they hate and racist about everything but God loves everyone and this lion dude needs to get fkd up like Tobias did I'd be there in my Hyena form with Marcus I get along with anyone of any religious my boyfriend is a Wiccan religion guy I plan on being spiritual as well as Wiccan we will share our beliefs with eachother I want to learn about different religions and beliefs and everything that idk about I like fursuits, bdsm and puppy play stuff I plan on supporting everything from Trans people to genderless to queen gender and etc as a gay pansexual guy I'm going to hopefully set Christianity on a peace and loving path rather this bs that the Bible and churches teaches its all man's word and man's word can burn in hell along with these hypocrite Christians who hate
Comments