FA+
Shop
Santa INC. Can spit it out but cant take it!
4 years ago
My Politics and Social views are ideas that I believe work. If something does not work I call it out.
Well it was a few years ago that I said I was done with Christmas specials that shit on Christmas. Since then there was "Sausage Party" a cartoon of store products that give the message "There is no God and fuck everyone you can."
Yeah, that's pretty fucking soulless....
For those who are trying to keep your souls during this time of great evil let me just say this....make it a point to listen to music and good people to keep your mind filled with the decency that you once knew.
We just experienced a "Joker" moment where a man ran down fifty people killing six. At least six dead at this time.
Maybe people shouldn't throw out hate like it's free candy because losers are going to eat that candy.
Now there is "Santa Inc" where two rich, elite, non Christians take a communist jab at a holiday that isn't theirs....again.
IT'S TOO WHITE!!
Well people fired back and the corporations removed the dislike button and the comments.
Dear Seth Rogan and Sarah Silverman...
You are corporate backed propagandists and you can't take it!
Fuck you people who think multi-millionaires are somehow..."oppressed!"
Getting run down at a Christmas parade is being oppressed.
And oh look at how certain people cheered that terrorist attack.
I am working quite a bit for the next few months after which I hope to get back to the art. Going to try and study daily however.
The Comic dream is still alive.
Mass murderer...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3nBFrXYAceA/
Yeah, that's pretty fucking soulless....
For those who are trying to keep your souls during this time of great evil let me just say this....make it a point to listen to music and good people to keep your mind filled with the decency that you once knew.
We just experienced a "Joker" moment where a man ran down fifty people killing six. At least six dead at this time.
Maybe people shouldn't throw out hate like it's free candy because losers are going to eat that candy.
Now there is "Santa Inc" where two rich, elite, non Christians take a communist jab at a holiday that isn't theirs....again.
IT'S TOO WHITE!!
Well people fired back and the corporations removed the dislike button and the comments.
Dear Seth Rogan and Sarah Silverman...
You are corporate backed propagandists and you can't take it!
Fuck you people who think multi-millionaires are somehow..."oppressed!"
Getting run down at a Christmas parade is being oppressed.
And oh look at how certain people cheered that terrorist attack.
I am working quite a bit for the next few months after which I hope to get back to the art. Going to try and study daily however.
The Comic dream is still alive.
Mass murderer...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3nBFrXYAceA/
And this shitshow looks on par with WOKEness and extreme leftist bullshit.
And what sickens me about the Waukesha Terrorist attack (Yes, it was a TERRORIST ATTACK!!!) is those that are actually DEFENDING Brooks, making excuses for him, going as far to say HE'S the actual victim!!! Fuck that Black Supremacist asshole!!! And the sad thing is how the media and Lefttards are quickly burying this and gaslighting it. BUT had Brooks been a white guy doing the same damn thing, hitting black folks. This would be non-stop news, finger pointing and George Floyd 2.0 in riots and protests.
And where is BLM on that Hmmm? Brooks was a hard core BLM supporter...where is BLM about Waukesha victims? Why aren't they bitching about Brooks and downplaying his actions.
Not a peep, doesn't meet the narrative.
In all honesty, the man is an absolute dunce cap, you know he doesn't give a shit about all the crime that's been going on in Los Angeles lately, shoplifting, theft, whatever. He has so much wealth and privilege, he doesn't mind that people are breaking into cars and stealing things. He seems to love it, says it's called "living in the city". It would be honor for Seth Rogen to tell me to "go fuck yourself" via DM and block me on Instagram.
New World Order dirtbags. "I got mine so screw y'all!"
Thankfully, Firefox has an add-on which RE-ENABLES the 'Dislike' button on Ewetube, so I can still laugh and add my own vote to all their *WOKE STUPIDITY*.
The fact they can't handle being mocked, only adds to the amusement factor!
Perhaps if they choose to grow the hell up and become mature, responsible members of humanity, they'd be of some value?
I'm not putting my meager $$$ on that happening.
*Clicky* on available link, refresh page, enjoy!
's so easy, even I did it w/o any major hiccups! (and that's sayin' somethin'!)
"One tells you that it didn't happen to the elves."
"The other tells you the elves had it coming."
"Both reindeers are right!"
Seriously though, this is a truly ugly looking series. Even if I skip the content those models and animation look awful (even on Ranken Bass standards).
Burroughs sounds vaguely familiar... although I might be thinking of the guy who wrote the John Carter novels.
*shrug*
the driver/assaulter (however you want to call him) is a known criminal who's been committing crimes since the 90's. when he drove through the crowd, he was actively fleeing a crime scene and choose to flee from police by driving through the crowd.
my first question is this:
how is a known criminal fleeing from police and running over innocent bystanders in the process "Oppression" ?
I'm asking this question since you make it sound as though this was some kind of deliberate, planned attack to achieve a political goal.
my second question is this:
what people cheered for this attack?
that's a very bold claim to make and I haven't heard anything about that. do you have some actual video evidence of this?
I can't post links.
are you seriously telling this to my face when i simply have to scroll up to see a journal that is full of links? -.-
even if you can't post links in comment, you could have easily send me the links via PM. or perhaps asked for my Discord or Telegram information to exchange the links that way. there are alternative methods of communication to provide and share links.
furthermore, you didn't even bother to actually answer my questions and try to explain yourself without links. I mean, one of my questions was "how is a known criminal fleeing from police and running over innocent bystanders in the process Oppression ?". are you seriously trying to tell me that you are incapable of answering this question and explaining yourself in your own words? do you really have to absolutely rely on links to a video for that?
this isn't a very hard question, i don't think. why can't you answer it by yourself without a video helping you or doing the work for you? hell, you don't even attempt to do it...
keeping all of this in mind and considering that i tried googling any of these claims and didn't come up with anything, i can only conclude that you have no evidence and rather than to the hard but honest thing and admit that you don't have any evidence to back it up, you choose to say "I can't post links" instead.
which is quite disrespectful and I don't appreciate it.
I am so sorry if i offended your mass murderer...
I asked how a known criminal, who is trying to flee from a crime he committed, killing several innocent people in the process, is in any way shape or form "oppression"
explain that to me in your own words, please
Tim Pool is making the claim that the murderer committed his crime as an intentional act of terrorism for political gains based on the murderer's social media posts.
the police on the other hand claims, and I'm quoting from the Daily Mail article that Tim Pool used in the video you linked ( https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar.....te-people.html )
quote: "Police said Brooks was leaving a domestic dispute in his SUV when he plowed into the festive crowds.
And one neighbour claims his ex-girlfriend was seen 'running away with no shoes and a black eye', moments before the carnage.
The Waukesha resident, named only as Ebony, lives across the street from Brooks and told The Sun the suspect had regular fights with his partner which she tried to break up and threatened to call the cops."
quote: "On Sunday, Brooks was fleeing the scene of a domestic dispute when he crashed into the crowds after smashing through safety barriers and breezing past cops."
and you are basically choosing to believe Tim Pool over both the police and The Daily Mail, a known right leaning news source of low credibility according to mediabiasfactcheck.com ( https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-mail/ )
is this correct?
You want to defend this scum ball I am not surprised.
Pedophiles, murderers and arsonists the communists will defend them all.
i am asking you how a known career criminal trying to flee police and running over bystanders in the process is oppressing you.
you still haven't answered that.
how is this oppressing you?
you're quick to make wild claims and accusations but when you're asked about it, you can never really explain yourself and try to either change the subject or to gaslight.
why?
I'm not your enemy. I'm not out to hurt you. I disagree with you heavily about this oppression nonsense you posted and absolutely fail to explain, yes, but I'm not out to hurt you or anything.
I'm not implying or accusing you of being a right wing extremist, nazi or anything like that.
I would greatly appreciate if you could be so kind and refrain from implying/accusing me of being a communist, pedophile, murderer and arsonist in return.
he wasn't the first person to do something like this and he won't be the last either.
these are the facts that we know, everything else is projection with little to no evidence to back it up.
why do you insist on making this political?
is every single crime going to be political now?
if a couple of blokes try and rob a bank, is that gonna make you feel oppressed too?
this guy was most likely not. the investigation is still ongoing though it is unlikely that this guy motivation was politics.
Not political my a$$.
You should feel ashamed.
how do you know for sure though that his racism was the actual motive behind his deed?
what evidence do you have to support this?
do you know something that the actual police who is investigating this crime doesn't know?
'cause the police who is actually investigating this crime doesn't seem to think that his racism was the motivation behind his deed and you're not a police officer investigating this crime, are you?
They made a Christmas cartoon political....
the topic of our discussion is the question: why do you insist on making a criminal fleeing from police political.
especially considering that you have no evidence to back up your claims.
why do you do this?
is that why you insist on politicizing a crime?
because Tim Pool said so and thus it must be true?
'cause that is not good reasoning.
The left is wrong because because both parties are willing to give blacks and browns analingus to vote for them the left is just more exuberant about it.
Do not parrot the lies, it makes you look stupid.
None of it is true. Flee a cop who is running after him after he started driving thru the parade and swiveling to hit as many people as possible?
Also they tried to put all his black supremacy posts on twitter/facebook down the memory hole.
also he fled from the police because of domestic violence. he was beating his girlfriend and the cops were called on him. that's why he tried to flee. this information is widely and easily available. how do you not know this?
And no, he was NOT on the run zigzagging and trying to hit as many people as he can while running from the police. Please watch the videos and stop trying to bullcrap us.
Funny that you fail to remember his hate posts..
to be perfectly blunt with you:
I find the police more believable than I do you. especially since the police is being supported by the overwhelming majority of news outlets from both the left and the right.
if you're trying to convince me that you are more believable than all of these combined, you are currently doing a very poor job.
No one here takes your trolling serious. You can count on that.
Shocker!
rather than complain that all other explanations are being demonized, you might want to take the time and thoroughly examine why the other explanations are being demonized.
doing some actual research for yourself instead of just listening to whatever Joe Rogan, Steven Crowder or Tim Pool have to say today might change your opinion on a lot of things.
it did so for me.
It sounds like you're trying to pretend that ignoring your pattern recognition makes you a good person.
You do realize that a person can notice certain patterns: the downplaying of b-on-w crime, blaming racism for crime oh and also the left has been trying to redefine racism so that only white people can be racist, and the blatant double standards without having a "victim mentality", right?
More importantly you project. In order to ignore all these obvious facts it is basically required to believe in the lib view that blacks and beowns are perpetual victims and thus whites deserve it or at the very least without actually confronting it you implicitly enable it.
all the "patterns" that you mention are flawed.
regarding b-on-w crime: for things to be labelled b-on-w crime, you need evidence. you need proof. most importantly, you need the kind of evidence that would hold up in a court of law.
I'm fully aware that the guy who drove into the crowd made racist remarks on his social media. the question is however whether you can factually prove that his racism was indeed the primary motive for him to drive through the crowd. you would also need to prove it so thoroughly to both convince a judge and jury that racism was indeed the motivation.
the thing is however: you can't.
certain talk show hosts, like Steven Crowder, Joe Rogan, Tim Pool and a few others, love to make allegations that racism and b-on-w crime was the primary motivation... but none of these people have a law degree. neither are any of these people police officers actually investigating the crime. so these claims are just that: claims.
of course, if you think you got the irrefutable evidence to prove these claims correct, you can always contact the authorities and present them with your evidence to see what they think about it. the police is usually willing to listen to witnesses and people who claim to have further evidence that could help the investigation.
as for the blaming racism for crime: not every crime being committed is blamed on racism.
and in regards to the whole projection thingy, i would recommend that you take a look at yourself because you are guilty of the very same thing.
you don't seem to have a lot of actual evidence to prove any of the claims you have made but for some reason you really want to believe in certain things and thus you accept them as true without question.
"...but none of these people have a law degree." Appeal to authority fallacy that ignores that you don't need a specific sheepskin to perform comparative analysis or understand the letter or spirit of the law or use precedent set by other cases to make an assertion.
"as for the blaming racism for crime: not every crime being committed is blamed on racism."
That's just sophistry and you know it. The left always claims that systemic racism is responsible the disparate crime rates. The left never allows for any idea other than systemic racism to even be spoken of.
"you don't seem to have a lot of actual evidence to prove any of the claims you have made"
I have video evidence, witness testimony, his history of violent crime, and his social media posts.
That alone should be more than enough to convince a rational jury.
-
no, i am not. the only reason you (or anyone for that matter) even mentions b-on-w crime specifically is in the context of hate crime. after all, why even bother to mention the skin color of the people involved if its not about a hate crime?
and in your case i can even prove it.
all i gotta do is copy and paste a quote from your own post which you made a few hours ago, quote: "The same news outlets that perpetually understate b-on-w hate crime in order to push an anti-wh*te narrative?"
the only reason you brought this topic up is so that you can make a victim narrative about racism and hate crime against white people.
not cool
i will tell you the same thing i told Alex and Abakan:
if you make an argument and the only way for you to back up your argument is by saying "because Tim Pool said so", then you are not making a very good argument.
either way, none of these things confirm any of the claims that Alex made earlier which prompted me to write my comment in the first place. the claims being that his actions were targeted oppresion or that people supposedly cheered for his reaction. so far, I have found no evidence that either of these claims are true.
i have no idea where you got the whole idea of... well... quote: "when the media bothers to mention that he was driving the car in the first place and doesn't use the passive voice to imply his vehicle spontaneously became aware decided to kill whites."
...that...
i will be blunt with you, that whole line reads like paranoia.
are you sure that you are feeling okay?
I don't have a law degree and neither do I have any evidence whatsoever that could prove in an court of law, in front of a judge and jury, that this was anything else.
i have the impression that you belong to the folks who seem adamant about this being a deliberate terrorist attack. well... do you have either a law degree or any evidence that could stand the test of court trial in front of a judge & jury to prove that this was indeed a terrorist attack?
if the answer to that question is "yes", why do you bother arguing with me? you should be talking to the authorities with your findings right now.
if the answer to that question is "no", why are you so adamant and hellbent on this claim being true? why is this the hill you want to die on?
Yet you feel compelled to share your opinion on the subject while others are just making claims. And and it's called establishing character and motive you can't just deny the video evidence and the social media posts under the idea that you need to have some mind reading device confirm a motive. The criticism also comes off half-baked because the prior precedent set by the left is to assume that any white-on-black incident is the result of racism the left's own standards condemn him.
"well... do you have either a law degree"
Appeal to authority is a fallacy I don't need a sheepskin to do a simple compare and contrast.
"any evidence that could stand the test of court trial in front of a judge & jury to prove that this was indeed a terrorist attack?"
Yes actually your unwillingness to confront said evidence notwithstanding.
I don't have any evidence that could prove in front of a Judge & Jury without the shadow of a doubt that the racism he displayed in his social media posts are the motive for his crime and to be perfectly blunt: I sincerely doubt that you have this kind of evidence as well.
which is why your response to me asking you to present your findings to the authorities was the not very believable "there's thousands of others who did so already so I don't have to" in an attempt to weasel your way out.
I don't like mob mentality and I don't want to return to the Salem Witch Trials.
if you want to convince me that you are right, you'll have to convince the police and the court that you are right.
I don't think these to be unreasonable standards.
"According to one law enforcement source, Brooks...fits the profile of a hardened — and entitled — criminal."
Quote not from video
we are talking about his motive. we are talking about the reason of why he did what he did.
nobody has any doubts whatsoever that he's a hardened and entitled criminal. the guy has been a career criminal for decades with a staggering record of recorded crimes. nevermind his history of domestic abuse and beating his girlfriends...
so no, there is not a single person who questions that Brooks is a hardened criminal.
that still isn't proof that he was motivated by racism and wanted to commit an act of terrorism.
just because one thing isn't true doesn't automatically mean whatever speculation you made earlier is right. that's not how criminal investigation works, my dude.
the only thing we know for sure is that we don't know for sure.
maybe, just maybe, instead of joining in the mob mentality of "oh, its an act of terrorism against white people", you should maybe, just maybe, just let the police do their job and finish their investigation?
what you want is to stop bothering with thorough police work and sentence people based on your gut feeling and whatever fits into your personal world view that day, no matter whether its actually connected to the crime or not.
that's not criminal justice, that's mob mentality and Salem Witch Trials.
I want the full truth and nothing but the truth.
you want something that you have already decided on being the truth to be confirmed as the truth.
there is the possibility that I was wrong the whole time and you were right. there is the possibility that you were wrong the whole time and I was right.
neither of us will know for sure until both investigation and trial are concluded, a verdict has been reached and a sentence has been passed.
Very sad
As for Rogan, I’m not going to listen to someone whose whole career was “weed bro huehuehue”