In regards to new changes on the site
2 years ago
Though I may have little to sincerely fear in concern to my work, I often dabble with shapes and anatomy that some may consider as past the rules. I explore all kinds of bodies to reflect a diverse and varied world with all kinds of creatures, anthropomorphic, feral and all the spectrum in-between.
Though I personally have not uploaded any that is an actual child to this website, I fear that some of the ways I depict some of my creatures such as the mimics, imps, goblins, or even just some anthros displaying neotenic anatomy (Ie, those who for one reason or another never had a "full" or developed puberty leading to a petite stature) may come under fire.
And whilst sure, maybe it's an over reaction on my part, I do not appreciate the generalise advice of "Just make sure they look like adults" when adults can appear in all kinds of shapes and sizes in a fantasy world.
And as it seems that such safety is only guaranteed dependent on my viewers deciding that this character is not, in fact, a child, or the one who gets the ticket disagreeing with them?
Just know I'll likely just be taking my work to inkbunny from now on over at https://inkbunny.net/LapinousMalice
I won't be able to split my content out like I have here, but I will be using the tag and Blocklist feature to help folk avoid content they wish not see.
It's been a fun run here, but, this whole thing is stressing me out as someone who already got mistakenly suspended over art I posted long before cub was even banned (and it wasn't even cub, just a neotenic character who was listed in the next submission over as 24)
There was no discussion or attempt to communicate with me. Just an immediate week's ban for an item on my oldest account I've not used in years at that point.
So frankly? I'd rather not risk that and short of going through and removing all potential art that might be confused as a child of all things and forever being paranoid on what truely toes the line past that 90 day grace period?
It's not worth it for my mental health, honestly.
Thanks for all the fish I guess!
Though I personally have not uploaded any that is an actual child to this website, I fear that some of the ways I depict some of my creatures such as the mimics, imps, goblins, or even just some anthros displaying neotenic anatomy (Ie, those who for one reason or another never had a "full" or developed puberty leading to a petite stature) may come under fire.
And whilst sure, maybe it's an over reaction on my part, I do not appreciate the generalise advice of "Just make sure they look like adults" when adults can appear in all kinds of shapes and sizes in a fantasy world.
And as it seems that such safety is only guaranteed dependent on my viewers deciding that this character is not, in fact, a child, or the one who gets the ticket disagreeing with them?
Just know I'll likely just be taking my work to inkbunny from now on over at https://inkbunny.net/LapinousMalice
I won't be able to split my content out like I have here, but I will be using the tag and Blocklist feature to help folk avoid content they wish not see.
It's been a fun run here, but, this whole thing is stressing me out as someone who already got mistakenly suspended over art I posted long before cub was even banned (and it wasn't even cub, just a neotenic character who was listed in the next submission over as 24)
There was no discussion or attempt to communicate with me. Just an immediate week's ban for an item on my oldest account I've not used in years at that point.
So frankly? I'd rather not risk that and short of going through and removing all potential art that might be confused as a child of all things and forever being paranoid on what truely toes the line past that 90 day grace period?
It's not worth it for my mental health, honestly.
Thanks for all the fish I guess!
IB is just more familiar to me really and the modbase seem much more approachable and reasonable
However I'm especially concerned because it does truely seem to be down to everyone who looks at the art agreeing that this character is not A Child In Disguiseâ„¢
Be that the person who may decide to alert the authorities that "This Mimic seems suspiciously child-coded for this adult comic"
And the mod recieving it, either because they don't believe it looks like a child or cause they got the appropriate context.
Only reason I'm so nervous is due to the fact I have already been hit by this rule before because someone took her name out of context. I thought her wide hips would spare me but no. Despite the reference for her being the next submission over saying she was, in fact, 25, Mika's stage name was Loli cause she liked to be sweet and innocent.
W h o o p s.
But also some of my characters are equally youthful looking and acting and the idea that they can't ever be drawn in porn bugs me a bunch cause I don't wanna risk it.
itaku.ee seems to poppin off, but thats just my recommendation?
At least you didn't go to Twitter as your main site.