Online Relationships
18 years ago
Interesting concept, obviously. At the core genuine relationships have to be built on honesty; at least something real, to actually be genuine.
Online relationships are rarely genuine consequently because they're generally born from the fake; a fandom, based on imaginary physical representations and the non-authentic personality people take-on online.
Of course this isn't a rule of finality. It depends on the people involved in every case. A percentage of people who enter into an online relationship have, or at least develope a real attachment to the person behind the 'game' they're interracting with, a small percentage even enter into an online relationship with immature but genuine feelings already developing.
This is where online relationships become the most interesting personal social mechanic. Because they universally perservere under three forms;
The online relationship transcends the internet, the contact-medium becomes simply that; a medium, the people shed their online persona in favor of interracting directly with one another genuinely, like on the telephone, simply through text. These evolve over time into voice and video chats where there is nowhere to hide and if the people's feelings truly are genuine, this reaffirmation only leads to one person moving to the other, and final step being achieved; the two people now live together, or near each other, and their real relationship continues no-longer dependant on that original medium.
For a far greater percentage, though, the transcendance fails. Partial increases in the genuine aspects of the relationship develop. Photos may be exchanged, voice-communication employed, maybe even webcam use coming into sporadic service. But the relationship is inherently bound to the medium it began on; the internet. The two people (or as more often the case, just one of them) have strong but ingenuine feelings for one another. This is often the case where the two people are openly together and comitted, but in reality one or both will have habbits of avoiding the other sporadically, opting away from frequent interraction to focus sporadically on other people. Usually one or both of these people have a psuedo-relationship with another person, or person(s) as the case may be. These are the online relationships that still have a chance to become real but in all reality, probably never will, unless on or both involved in it shed the selfish and dishonest aspects of their behavior to show the other they're ready to progress.
The third and more tragic form of online relationship is the one that never grows or evolves from the most basic start. It is a relationship born in an imaginary world in which both people in it interreact with one-another through imaginary personalities. They fabricate more complex false-identities to reveal to one another to further pretend what they have is meaningful and genuine but neither is serious. One or both people in these relationships are usually involved in frequent if not semi-frequent cyber-sex with other people and though they'll deny it indignantly are always looking for someone more easily manipulated and conthrived to fulfil their selfish needs.
Comparitively speaking; the first type of online relationship is considerably rare. The second type is quite common, but not nearly as proliferant as the third type; which the vast majority of the furry community participates in.
Why do I bring all this up? Not to take a shot at the furry community. But to share a perspective that I was ignorant to before I broke away from the majority of the fandom.
My meager advice is this; if you're in a relationship that began in, grew from, or intergrated into the furry fandom, read through this, and carefully consider what type of online-relationship you're in. If you're in the first type, you have only more reason to be proud of what you have. If you're in the second type, you need to acknowledge whether or not you're the one (if its not that both of you are) that behave in the way that keeps it from becoming the first type. And for god's sake, if you're in the third type, acknowledge it, and get past it, for your own sake most of all.
And to all those who see fit to vomit immature commentary at me for saying all this, I say simply this; the internet may be an annonymous playground where you get to insult and belittle others for the sake of your own fragile and fleeting ego, to you, but most people see it as a social interraction medium. And at the end of the day, I don't really care what some weak, fragile little person hiding behind their computer to take shots at people they wouldn't have the balls to even speak to in person thinks.
To those of you with the maturity and intellectual capacity to read this for what it is, I hope I've shared this perspective effectively.
-Dev.
I have serveral on-line relationships myself, specially when the geographycal aspect won't help, still, as you mentioned, thanks to programs like Skype, they are as geniuine as they can, watching and listening the other person as well as the other one watches and listens to me. ^^
However, does that include all relationships, or just, for lack of a better term, romantic ones? If you form a mutual friendship with someone you have no romantic attachments to at all, aside from genuine care and consideration as a friend, how does that factor into your three-part scale? Or is that a seaprate entity alltogether?
Let me demonstrate:
Internet is serious business.
See? Hilarious! :D
It's sad. I wish there was a less pessimistic face to put on it, but when expressing a perspective of this nature, one has to be a realist.
I do see your point, though. I didn't mean to imply there were an extremely small amount; just a very small amount by comparison.
Though I have one question. What are your thoughts about when someone says "Love you" or "I love you" even though the two of you barely know one another.
As for me, I am in a relationship that began online and evolved into a primarily phone-based relationship. It's lasted for eight years now and is quite stable.
This is an interesting and thought-provoking journal, though.
Though at the same time I can state that with my current relationship, I'm living with my partner after having moved half way across the country, and she too is also a furry...so for the most part i believe that puts as in type one :) So I can also assure you I know the alue of it all well.
There are also two other couples that I work with who met online and have been happily married (5years and 15years).
Of the three, only my fiance and I were then, and actively are now, in the fandom - but our 'fursonas' weren't an issue when we first began speaking.
'The Bun' (as I call her, refering to her fursona) and I met on the forums for a Furry webcomic and (as your first situation details) went from texting, to phone, to her moving in with me and (in due time) getting engaged.
The benefit, I saw, of meeting via the internet (though it's also the cheif drawback) is that the two people involved, if they are honest with one another, get to know the person themself before they know anything else about them.
Indeed, The Bun had a very androgynous screename when we first met and I assumed that She was a He - so her first hints of 'interest' went largly unnoticed.
But we continued chatting and I was eventually corrected. But by that time, I had already generated a fondess for her that was easily transmuted (as we began phoning one another) into mutual attraction and eventually put us into the marriage-expectant couple we are now.
While online 'Yiff' sessions are always going to outweigh meaningful and genuine mutual-relationships - I don't think that the online relationship is any worse then searching the local bar for 'chicks' (or vise-versa).
When I had a discussion with one of my coworkers on why I didn't go to bars to find a "nice girl", my reply was that:
1. I don't drink.
2. The kind of girl I would want a lasting relationship with would not be hanging around a bar entertaining 'suggestions' from strangers.
Every mode of love-search has it's own risks and drawbacks. The internet, as it is right now, is certainly one of most trecherous, but I wouldn't look at it negatively as a means of meeting possible partners.
If nothing else, it simply requires a good deal more honest and trust.
D.O.P.R
The risk of lying is a danger no matter what medium you meet someone in-whether it be in a bar, on the phone or online. The farther one is from a face to face contact, the higher the risk, but the risk is always there.
The key, as in any relationship is being honest with the other person and respecting them enough to be so.
The internet has the potential to bring together people who have similar interests and could be really good together who might not have ever met due to distance, or what have you.
While I see some grain of truth in the original post, I would say not to categorize the relationships quite so much.
I would be more critical of those who choose to use others in the way described, and remember that not everyone is so callous.
BUT. An extremely well thought out and steepled in fact idea. Horrifyingly accurate. But. Still Somewhat engaging. Great stuff :3
Also, your entry was great.
I'd like to hear more from The Wise Dev.