FA+
Shop
The Difference between a real and a subjective Plot hole
a year ago
I often see people pointing things they dislike in a story and calling it a plot hole, when it after a little thought it turns out it's not.
A real plot hole isn't necessary that by the rules of the setting can't be resolved with out a specific explanation. A subjective plot hole is one that can easily be explained with a generic explanation.
No one poops in a sitcom? Is it really a plot hole? A sitcom is basically the retelling of a humorous life event. Parts that aren't relevant to the story are pretty much excluded. Mundane activities like using the toilet often are not part of the story.
A character suddenly gains expertise in a field they can't possibly understand? That's a real issue. Having the knowledge impacts the story, it can't be dismissed because expertise in a subject should naturally come up, because it's part of the story.
Rey Palpatine being a match for Kylo Ren in thier first encounter makes no sense. A rookie even a prodigy does not match up to a trained foe of equal power. Had she been shown using just a ordinary sword to fight, as opposed to a staff, it would have worked, sword fighting would be an established skill she had.
Luke being able to blow up the Death Star works because he was established as good pilot in dialogue and he had the assistance of Obi Wan's ghost and Han Solo covering him. His skill was established and he had assistance.
A real plot hole isn't necessary that by the rules of the setting can't be resolved with out a specific explanation. A subjective plot hole is one that can easily be explained with a generic explanation.
No one poops in a sitcom? Is it really a plot hole? A sitcom is basically the retelling of a humorous life event. Parts that aren't relevant to the story are pretty much excluded. Mundane activities like using the toilet often are not part of the story.
A character suddenly gains expertise in a field they can't possibly understand? That's a real issue. Having the knowledge impacts the story, it can't be dismissed because expertise in a subject should naturally come up, because it's part of the story.
Rey Palpatine being a match for Kylo Ren in thier first encounter makes no sense. A rookie even a prodigy does not match up to a trained foe of equal power. Had she been shown using just a ordinary sword to fight, as opposed to a staff, it would have worked, sword fighting would be an established skill she had.
Luke being able to blow up the Death Star works because he was established as good pilot in dialogue and he had the assistance of Obi Wan's ghost and Han Solo covering him. His skill was established and he had assistance.
Which aren't really plot holes, but more like flaws in the story or worldbuilding.