As far as I know Inkbunny is a site for artist who are solely interested in selling their art. Dinkbunny only accepts finished and quality art for prints. Inkfunky is bit too cutesy for me plus I would rather be lazy and do more traditional works than submitting digital work on Ginrummy.

So FurAffinity for the greedy and anal-retentive..?

The only advantage is the keyword filter that doesn't work with shit on this site but it works over there.

It isn't SOLELY dedicated to sales, but definitely incorporates the functions for digital and print selling which is its main advantage over FA. Also a strict No Humans policy, which I dislike

Wow. You and Shub paint a scary picture for me - one of a version of FA that features only the kind of artists I hate.

I've been further informed that the No Humans policy is practical rather than some kind of Fur Supremacist nonsense. It seems their various third parties - printing service, online payment, that sort of thing - would be uncomfortable working with them since Inkbunny carries a lot of erotic work (including cub art), but if it's only cartoon animals rather than humans, they're not bothered so much

I dunno, I might put my stories up on the site. Any publicity is good publicity. Otherwise I'm not much concerned either way with it and I'm kind of suspecting it may end up going the way Furocity did

I'm probably just gonna stay here. Good to know they don't police humans, though - VCL tried pulling that and it was frankly offputting. They have a rule that for every human you upload there need to be ten nonhumans in your gallery, it's like "what?"

I don't blame you. Also the VCL thing is bizarre to say the least. I often forget that archive still exists, I was ploughing through it regularly back in 2001

I've been watching the For Sale section and it's frankly puzzling. Most of the artwork available under that banner so far seems to be, broadly speaking, cheesecake pinups that I can't really imagine anyone would want to buy either a grand-size digital download or a laserprint of. Is there really that big a perceived market for furries buying frameable hi-def copies of these images? I think the thing that's going to decide if Inkbunny lives or dies is whether it can provide sales to artists, and really I think a lot of them are going to be disappointed because they don't seem to be providing anything I imagine an audience would want. The money in furry comes from providing people with their fantasies, not from high-resolution run-offs of someone else's. I could be wrong about that of course, so don't quote me on it yet, haha!

Man the word "provide" appears a lot in that!

I agree with you on two fronts, 1) why would you want to pay money for another person's fetish / species tastes when you can get it on the net for free, and 2) where the FUCK would you DISPLAY a pornographic furry print?
You'd pretty much have to be an elite-grade furfag to even dare doing that. We tend to be ourselves on the internet quite openly (hell, look at me!), but would you be happy to put up a poster of a fox getting fucked in three holes in your living room? Unless you had no shame whatsoever, you'd be taking it down every time you had a non-furry visitor come over. Which I assume would include all of one's family.

I actually hope most artists move there, there are quite a lot of shits here that I would love to see go away.

Yeah as long as they don't post on both accounts, haha.

They are usually fad followers...so...

I saw it was for selling work. plus there print service is better then DA by far. I made an account but then I lost motivation to do anything with it x3.

Haha, aww. XD
Yeah I never bothered with the print account stuff on DA because there's too many rules. I also don't like the idea that a site is (unawarely, pretty much!) taking a 50% cut for my hard work.

I know thats one of the reasons why I hate DA. I just don't even go on there anymore to upload work.

Eh, I'm not interested. It seems better suited to people that want to sell their art.

I hear that, my female bruva.