Writing sucks
15 years ago
Y'know why? Cause no matter what anyone does or how good they get or how fantastical their style becomes, it will -always- just be words. This hit me after someone said something kinda mean to me yesterday, and I guess it's sticking! Felt like I should share it here, though it's hard to tell the difference between this journal and let's say, anything else ever written. X3
Feh, I hate it when people are inconsiderate, especially when they do it by "accident." At least AC was fun.
Feh, I hate it when people are inconsiderate, especially when they do it by "accident." At least AC was fun.
FA+

What's wrong with words? Words are pretty powerful.
And I was just feeling meh and then someone said that to me and it felt like the light bulbs in my head were all shattered with the subtlety of a baseball bat.
Music sucks. Y'know why? Cause no matter what anyone does or how good they get or how fantastical their style becomes, it will -always- just be sound.
Don't let this discourage you. There is a massive difference between good and bad writing. Compare a Kurt Vonnegut novel to a J.K. Rowling novel. Brave New World to Twilight. There is no comparison. Vonnegut's and Huxley's words mean so much more and carry a greater weight.
Kurt Vonnegut is essentially dog shit in a bag when you compare him to Shakespeare. :V
To me, writing will always be better...because with writing you can always be more detailed that artwork. It's like you write the picture in people's minds.
Think of great works like the LOR series or RA Salvatore's books.
Also AC was fun<3
a picture, no matter how awesome and fantastical it is, is just one picture portraying just that image. you can speculate there is more, you can imagine there's a meaning to every detail, but you don't know.
With writing, the details are there. The atmosphere, the thoughts, the feelings, the affection, the terror, the environment, everything. and it can put a person there. It's hard for a picture to do all that.
Of course, we're both in the wrong fandom if we're looking for people, en masse to take our words with great distinction. ;.; freaking derps with their instant gratification and murrypurryfilth...
But yeah, shitty history jokes aside, there's no such thing as 'just' words, because what matters is the meaning beneath them, the context in which they are said, and the people who are inspired by them that gives them power.
.... That and I really wanna read the rest of your Trepidation story >//> Honesty is the best policy, but my point still stands~
<3
Basically, if you're too lazy to read, you're a few steps away from trailer trash. :3
So yea, in a way the person that said that writing was just words was correct, especially because the degree of "more than just words" varies from person to person.
Hope you can make your writing at that level for yourself and, of course, for other people. I haven't read something of yours for a while so i cant say anything about it right now to be honest
Go for it.
Whoever told you that is probably just sour because they can't get "just words" on paper to write as well as you can.
D: And don't be down! You're one of the reasons I even -took- a stab at writing myself! I NEED SOMEONE TO CRITIQUE ME BACK WHO I KNOW IS CREDIBLE ;o;
It's hard to argue against the idea that writing is, fundamentally, an exercise in drawing from a finite collection of building blocks and trying to arrange them in a useful way, and that the physical thing you end up with is a piece of paper with some ink on it. Similarly, writing a video game comes down to arranging ones and zeros in the proper order, and the thing you end up with is a small plastic circle with a shiny side.
The object of writing isn't to create words; it's to create a story or deliver an idea. The words are merely the delivery mechanism. When the words are interpreted, the story comes out. Your reader may not be able to see or hear or touch what's happening, but if you do your job right, they'll know what it would be like to see or hear or touch what's happening, and sometimes that's just as good. It's still one of the most powerful ways to store and share a series of events -- you can create a rich narrative in a complete world in a format that doesn't take up a lot of space or resources, and other people can experience it with nothing more than their eyes.
Try not to worry too much about the material aspect. It's not as limiting as you'd think.
Seriously, they may "just" be words, but that's fine. Words work on the imagination in a way pictures cannot. They let the reader imagine what the characters look like with only minor help from adjectives describing nouns. They let one's brain fill in the missing pieces.
For instance... You could be a young, toned, handsome hunk of a skunk with a unique pattern of stripes running crisscrossed down your back and tail, ending in a white tuft of fur on your head. You can have a drop-dead gorgeous smile as you wink and motion someone forward so they can bury their hands, or paws in your velvety fur, feeling the warmth of your body heat radiating through their fingers as you give their head a gentle rumple with your own handpaw.
How many panels of action did you just describe? It took me about two or three minutes to write that. How long would it take an artist to accomplish the same in as much detail as was described? In addition, what else could a person come up with on their own? I said a crisscrossing of stripes... They could be in a ton of patterns, a few stripes, a lot of stripes... I said you were toned, but how toned? Buff? Still soft-looking? Strong, but with a nice, jelly-belly leftover? ;3