Disclaimer: I am not taking either side in this argument as I have chosen to not actually take part, and follow my own advice, but since you fuckers bring your arguments around me and end up getting me in them, it has started affecting me, becoming my problem, and I'm going to try to get a few of you to get some fucking eyes open.

Hey, you guys arguing against dogfucking!

Ignore it.
It is not your life, it does not affect you, it is not your problem.

Quit using broken arguments.
I've seen these arguments repetitively:
"Dogs cannot consent!"
"They have been trained for thousands of years to submit to humans!"
"A person cannot tell whether a dog is humping in a sexual manner or if it's a show of dominance!"
Are you guys seeing how this is flawed yet? Let me break it down:
Dogs = Submissive to humans.
If dogs are submissive, as you say, to humans, then why are they humping for dominance? They know you're their dominant, so why should they care? Also, ever noticed how in actual relationships between dogs, it tends to work out that there's no monogamy or real relationship? There's mating and it's over. There's SEX and it's over. It is quite often a show of dominance. It is programmed into these dogs' minds to do so by nature.

Please feel free to not argue against this. Do not be sending me nasty notes, do not be posting argumentative comments to this journal. This is not to start a discussion or argument. Anyone who DOES argue this with me will be considered to be attempting to harass me, considering that I have stated that I have no true opinion in this argument, and that I do not want to start an argument in my journal.