This is very much a great concern.

Block googletagservices.com, google-analytics.com and doubleclick.net from ever running scripts on this site, using AdBlock or NoScript. Everything will stay green then, and your pages will load a bit faster, because their darn tracking scripts won't be loading all the time.

or uBlock Origin which is way better than AdBlock

I tried uBlock, and it doesn't handle my required large font size without totally breaking my Firefox UI. I couldn't even use the Firefox menu to uninstall the add-on, because it messed things up that bad. Luckily, I backup my Firefox before trying new add-ons, so I got back to normal rather quickly.

Not sure what happened. I tried setting the font size on my browser to 72 and it worked fine. What font are you using?

It's not the font size for the pages. It's the system font size for the browser UI itself that messes it up. The add-on doesn't seem to like when the system font is larger than normal, but I can't see the menus in my programs if that isn't set large. I fought with it for about two days before finally giving up. All it did was give me overlapping text, duplicated menu buttons, and import menu items pushed off screen where I couldn't access them. It didn't matter which font, as I tried a dozen of them. The only fix I found was to make my system fonts too small for my eyes to read - then UBlock behaved. It might be a great add-on with normal system font settings, but it doesn't play well with visual accessibility needs. On the other hand, neither AdBlock nor NoScript suffers from this problem.

Just tried changing the font for the browser UI using the "Theme Font & Style Changer" still nothing, what font are you using? What version of uBlock? Are you using uBlock or uBlock Origin?

I used whichever version of uBlock was current back in March. I haven't touched it since. I don't recall seeing the word Origin in the name at the time. Like I said, about the fonts, I tried at least a dozen of them. Those included Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, Comic Sans, MS Sans Serif, Lucidia, and anything else that I though I could actually read. Most other fonts are borderline unreadable to me.

I also use "Theme font and style changer", for Firefox. That seemed to have no effect on uBlock. I'm talking about the system-wide "system fonts", the ones you need to reboot your system after changing, because they affect the entire operating system, and all programs that run under it. Right now, I'm set at Arial Unicode MS 17 point at 156 percent (150 DPI). That's as small as I can go and still remain able to read my screen comfortably. When I set my system fonts down to 125 percent, uBlock didn't cause problems, but I also couldn't read my screen that way without leaving nose marks on the surface of my monitor! I might take a look at uBlock Origins some time when I have some hours to burn, but AdBlock works so well, that I hardly have the need. There is pretty much nothing I can't block with AdBlock, and it's pretty light on my resources. I just use my own custom filters, and not any of the subscriptions.

Not sure if there's a difference between normal fonts and system fonts. The bug could've been present back then but I wouldn't know as I wasn't using uBlock back then.

Thanks for the tip but I'm not sure I'm doing this right. I'm still getting the This page is dangerous thing whenever I go to look at any art on the site.

I'm Using Adblock

Also I don't understand how blocking that stuff would make it appear green with McAfee's SiteAdvisor. Even going to their website and putting in the link to an FA page like this one in my gallery http://www.furaffinity.net/view/16165675/ gets the result of being viewed as dangerous. Here's the page report. https://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/h.....view/16165675/

It says FA is the problem but putting in the link for the site itself produces this green safe one. https://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/h.....raffinity.net/

My malware scanner seems to check the individual pages each time they are visited. With ad blocking on, all is green. With blocking off, sometimes I see red on sites, but never on FA.

McAfee's SiteAdvisor is obviously not actually looking at the actual page, but working off some other sort other data. The report you provided says that it found ustream.tv, mediawiki.org and deviantart.com, yet the problem page does not contain links or scripts from any of those in the source. It's looking like someone reported to SiteAdvisor that FA was a problem, and SiteAdvisor never actually verified that before marking the site as bad. SiteAdvisor's info is clearly wrong here. I looked at the page source and there is nothing even remotely malware-like on it.

Okay, I checked SiteAdvisor's list of users who rated and commented on the site - all 13 of them. Three users, "starplz", "non" and "Anon21981" rated it as dangerous, but for bad reasons. One flagged it for "Adware, spyware, or viruses", which was partially true for all of a day, because they did put up adware for that time. Another flagged FA as a "Bad shopping experience", because it supposedly allows babyfur pornography! The rules on the site don't allow any under-aged sex, so that person submitted a false rating. And, the last one flagged it for "Adware, spyware, or viruses", because it's "full of pedophiles." It sounds like personal grudges against FA to me.

To hopefully fix the problem. go to your SiteAdvisor report and click on the "Request a review" button. From there, you can mark it as safe, select art as the category, and leave a comment if you like. It looks like SiteAdvisor just take user's words for whether a site is safe or not. They surely didn't actually scan it. I've never had an FA page come up in an actual malware or virus scan.

I have a feeling that some disgruntled FA users are just trying to poison the McAfee because they're pissed at the site. That probably means more people like you and I going in and giving it a safe rating to make everything green again.

Thanks. I think odds are someone did report it or something using one of the submission pages hence why only the submission pages are marked. That or this may be some kind of oversight. Not sure. I did bring it to Dragoneer's attention with a note as well this seemed important enough as I would guess your right that it's just someone trying to hurt FA. I've already taken the liberty of requesting a review so here's hoping.

I did the "request a review" thing too, and left a comment about what FA actually is. Personally, I think people should be required to link to a page that actually contains malware, in order to report a site as a malware site. SiteAdvisor should at least check before accepting such reports.

Agreed. *nods* Anyway I just heard from Dragoneer and they think it's a false positive too. Their waiting to hear back from McAfee about it. Hopefully that and a few site patrons requesting a review will get things straightened out. ^^