FA+
Shop
Top Ten Reasons LGBTQ-Nation Has Lost Its Mind
8 years ago
So, I saw this delightful little article elsewhere, and... well, feel free to read the article, it'll give you an idea of the kind of people who run that place.
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2016/02.....-lgbtq-people/
Are you done with that... Well, let's call it a 'special' collection of words. Yes, 'collection of words' is the highest compliment I can give it. I mean, I can't call it the usual things, as the moderators would probably cite me for hate-speech - no matter how apt or appropriate they are. So, I'll have to settle for 'special', and assume you guys know what I'm referring to.
So, let's review their reasons, in order;
10. "REEEEEE HE DIDN'T USE A PREFERRED PRONOUN!" - wow, strong start. Already insisting that if you don't speak and think as they do, you are apparently a homophobe.
9. They're annoyed that Trump is annoyed at the NFL for fining a player for saying allegedly 'homophobic' comments... But, given the article is so vague about the incident, I expect it's more bullshit like the rest of the list. The only thing I could find was some other player saying something like "you shouldn't be fucking making out with your boyfriend on national television, kids could be watching", and they think Trump is basically Hitler for saying that the NFL crossed the line for fining the player for that tweet. Oh, and the best part? The tweet may have been a 'social experiment' to see how people reacted, and he was trying to expose anti-LGBT bias.
8. Sick burn = anti-LGBT hate-speech, apparently - even though the insult was to the straight woman rather than the gay man that left her. Yeah, try wrapping your head around that twisted reasoning.
7. He supports "H.R.2802 - First Amendment Defense Act" - the full text can be found here; https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2016/02.....-lgbtq-people/
- but basically, it prevents the federal government from discriminating against religious people in the same way they're already prevented from discriminating against homosexuals. They're complaining about equal treatment, in other words.
6. Believe it or not, you can be against discrimination against gays and against gay marriage. In the first place, you can be against ALL government-recognized marriage. In the second, if you believe marriage is by definition something between a man and a woman, that does not preclude, say, a gay man marrying a lesbian - ie, they still have the right. You may not care to, but if we're already talking about specially set-up legal privileges provided by government that grant benefits to one group at the expense of others, it's a bit rich to be complaining about 'discrimination'.
5. He believes same-sex-marriage should be an issue decided by the states. SO HOMOPHOBIC ZOMG
4. Trump DARES to say he'd disapprove of a hypothetical grandchild being gay, but would still love and cherish them - don't you KNOW it's HOMOPHOBIA unless you totally and completely support someone's sexuality?! Fucking hell, the pearl-clutching is real XD
3. He used a poor golf metaphor to explain why he disagrees with homosexuality. Seriously? This is what you're worried about?
2. Trump was apparently absolutely evil for not condemning another person as the antichrist when they dared to say that marriage was meant to be between one man and one woman.
And their number one reason is, in 1999, he said that equal treatment for LGBT people "Isn't something he's given a lot of thought to". That's right; their biggest reason for saying Trump is a homophobe is he didn't really care much about the issue in 1999. Since he was not for them, he must have obviously been against them.
Please, LGBTQ-Nation and groups/people like this, PLEASE keep this up; this sort of histrionic pearl-clutching is the shit that got Trump elected in the first place. It'll make Christmas in 2020 all the more precious - except instead of visions of sugarplums dancing in my head, it'll be SJWs bawling their eyes out as they gibber incoherently about homophobia and muh-sojiny.
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2016/02.....-lgbtq-people/
Are you done with that... Well, let's call it a 'special' collection of words. Yes, 'collection of words' is the highest compliment I can give it. I mean, I can't call it the usual things, as the moderators would probably cite me for hate-speech - no matter how apt or appropriate they are. So, I'll have to settle for 'special', and assume you guys know what I'm referring to.
So, let's review their reasons, in order;
10. "REEEEEE HE DIDN'T USE A PREFERRED PRONOUN!" - wow, strong start. Already insisting that if you don't speak and think as they do, you are apparently a homophobe.
9. They're annoyed that Trump is annoyed at the NFL for fining a player for saying allegedly 'homophobic' comments... But, given the article is so vague about the incident, I expect it's more bullshit like the rest of the list. The only thing I could find was some other player saying something like "you shouldn't be fucking making out with your boyfriend on national television, kids could be watching", and they think Trump is basically Hitler for saying that the NFL crossed the line for fining the player for that tweet. Oh, and the best part? The tweet may have been a 'social experiment' to see how people reacted, and he was trying to expose anti-LGBT bias.
8. Sick burn = anti-LGBT hate-speech, apparently - even though the insult was to the straight woman rather than the gay man that left her. Yeah, try wrapping your head around that twisted reasoning.
7. He supports "H.R.2802 - First Amendment Defense Act" - the full text can be found here; https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2016/02.....-lgbtq-people/
- but basically, it prevents the federal government from discriminating against religious people in the same way they're already prevented from discriminating against homosexuals. They're complaining about equal treatment, in other words.
6. Believe it or not, you can be against discrimination against gays and against gay marriage. In the first place, you can be against ALL government-recognized marriage. In the second, if you believe marriage is by definition something between a man and a woman, that does not preclude, say, a gay man marrying a lesbian - ie, they still have the right. You may not care to, but if we're already talking about specially set-up legal privileges provided by government that grant benefits to one group at the expense of others, it's a bit rich to be complaining about 'discrimination'.
5. He believes same-sex-marriage should be an issue decided by the states. SO HOMOPHOBIC ZOMG
4. Trump DARES to say he'd disapprove of a hypothetical grandchild being gay, but would still love and cherish them - don't you KNOW it's HOMOPHOBIA unless you totally and completely support someone's sexuality?! Fucking hell, the pearl-clutching is real XD
3. He used a poor golf metaphor to explain why he disagrees with homosexuality. Seriously? This is what you're worried about?
2. Trump was apparently absolutely evil for not condemning another person as the antichrist when they dared to say that marriage was meant to be between one man and one woman.
And their number one reason is, in 1999, he said that equal treatment for LGBT people "Isn't something he's given a lot of thought to". That's right; their biggest reason for saying Trump is a homophobe is he didn't really care much about the issue in 1999. Since he was not for them, he must have obviously been against them.
Please, LGBTQ-Nation and groups/people like this, PLEASE keep this up; this sort of histrionic pearl-clutching is the shit that got Trump elected in the first place. It'll make Christmas in 2020 all the more precious - except instead of visions of sugarplums dancing in my head, it'll be SJWs bawling their eyes out as they gibber incoherently about homophobia and muh-sojiny.
Btw, the B stands for Bi, right? So there ARE only 2 genders! Even they say so.
Just noticed it was a review of someone else's top 10 list.
Another thing: I am tired of them trying to add more shit on top the LGBT. Don't lump me into a group of transsexuals, pedosexuals etc. For fuck sake. *Rant ended*
A) has nothing in common with homosexuality
B) is not really a thing to be "proud" of or even talk about outside of your partner, doctor, people who actually NEED to know, etc. :P
The whole thing is quite silly to me. The LGBT "community" seems to be little more than self-righteous attention whores who just wanna be "different." The whole thing makes me cringe, roll my eyes, and occasionally laugh at the ridiculousness.
wut
https://web.archive.org/web/2013031.....er.com/5941037
this actually made my stomach flip
I would NEVER, EVER, EVER bring up being trans to a child. [When they ask if I'm a boy or a girl, I honestly reply, "I'm a girl!" and smile. That's the right thing to do.] Imagine some creepy guy fucking FLIRTING with an innocent tiddlywink.
i'm hurting right now. :[ THANK YOU GADAMLU U POS
[jaykay it was my fault for asking i seriously did not believe you at first]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3adatEVSL9M
save me, hypnotherapy!
OH GOD...
OH...
OH MY FUCKING GOD
Trump doesn't hold back when something is on his mind. He hasn't made a whole lot of comments against the LGBT community, and he hasn't prioritized LGBT hate in his agenda, so I'm not really too concerned with that...
As for your points, I disagree with your #7 and #5
#7) H.R.2802 - First Amendment Defense Act is clearly intended to make it easier for religious organizations to discriminate against homosexuals.
#5) Handing Same-Sex marriage to the states is ridiculous. The argument for states-rights in this case is to allow states to choose not to allow same-sex marriages.
As for #7 - here's the full text;
Prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person on the basis that such person believes or acts in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction that: (1) marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman, or (2) sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.
Defines "discriminatory action" as any federal government action to discriminate against a person with such beliefs or convictions, including a federal government action to:
-alter the federal tax treatment of, cause any tax, penalty, or payment to be assessed against, or deny, delay, or revoke certain tax exemptions of any such person;
-disallow a deduction of any charitable contribution made to or by such person;
-withhold, reduce, exclude, terminate, or otherwise deny any federal grant, contract, subcontract, cooperative agreement, loan, license, certification, accreditation, employment, or similar position or status from or to such person; or
-withhold, reduce, exclude, terminate, or otherwise deny any benefit under a federal benefit program.
Requires the federal government to consider to be accredited, licensed, or certified for purposes of federal law any person who would be accredited, licensed, or certified for such purposes but for a determination that the person believes or acts in accordance with such a religious belief or moral conviction.
Permits a person to assert an actual or threatened violation of this Act as a claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding and to obtain compensatory damages or other appropriate relief against the federal government.
Authorizes the Attorney General to bring an action to enforce this Act against the Government Accountability Office or an establishment in the executive branch, other than the U.S. Postal Service or the Postal Regulatory Commission, that is not an executive department, military department, or government corporation.
Defines "person" as any person regardless of religious affiliation, including corporations and other entities regardless of for-profit or nonprofit status.
For instance, in a place where who a person is boinking is a valid consideration - such as, say, a catholic church - prohibiting gay priests and such is entirely in accordance with their faith, as they don't allow adulterers and such either. In cases where a client's or employee's sex life is not an issue, but they simply don't want to participate in gay marriage because of their moral convictions, they are allowed to not perform activities that would make them participate in gay weddings. That seems to be what the law says. Do you believe this is not what the law says, or do you disagree with that idea?
As for #5 - show me where in the Constitution that the Federal government is granted authority over marriage, and I can accept it as a Federal issue. Until then, the Tenth Amendment stands;
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
First, he mis-names and mis-genders Caitlyn Jenner."
2 sentences in and it's pure SJW feelings nonsense xD This is gonna be good.