Hubs said this too. The fact that it wasn't the blue wave polls were expecting shows the true reflection of America. Sadly the fact that at this point 70M people voted for someone who has said what he said, do what he did, and supports what he supported despite if a normal person were to do it would have their life ruined makes me wonder how strong bias is over personal values. Then again some people may have just shitty values that align with their bias.
An observation I had from looking at the numbers is it seems that many republican senators kept their seat despite the vote going biden in that state..... that is interesting.
It does suggest that there's a significant faction of biden voters who voted for their existing republican senator. Does also imply that there's a significant population that like republican rule but just hate trump.... or the existing senitor is just very well liked but they just don't like the guy on top.
Studying these numbers is... facinating. has a lot of implications. Suggests that if Trump was less divisive he could have very easily won.
Actually, it suggests that there's a lot of fraudulent ballots that only have the presidential race filled in... PA's numbers for the presidential race have been climbing while the House races remain static.
wasn't referring to PA Kythra. this observation of mine was from the states that are more or less done counting that most people who are complaining about fraud are ignoring..... like say Maine.
Or the house votes for districts like California, new mex, and colorado. the mismatch between the president choice and the colours for the house elect are interesting.
Focused on those states that were strongly decided already to remove potential bias in swing states by focusing on those that both sides have accepted and have moved on from. Cause I did forsee someone's going to leap out and immediately say that swing states are full of fraud ballets. That one is an argument I want no part of, so I'm just looking at data that nobody's contesting.
Ah, okay. True, most folks aren't paying attention to the states that performed as expected. And it is mainly true across the board. Biden, even if he eventually is declared the winner, did not have coattails at all.
Yeah the states that performed as expected are a good source of info on the population dynamics as a result. If you're trying to do an objective study... those are the best places to take a look at. it's fascinating. from that pool i drew from it seems to suggest that the people in those states are happy with their current senator/house member, just not with whoever on top.
that is interesting. because usually if people are set for a particular party you'd usually expect they'd vote all 3 of the same party. it's possible these may be unaligned voters who are just happy with how their current senator/house rep runs their district but just don't like the big boss?
Yeah I don't think he's supporters will go back into the dark overnight. And at this point I feel like just treating them like they treated the Dems these past four years. Just hope the Dems can get the house and senate next election and give Biden enough power to undo everything Trump has done. Sadly just doing THAT might take up Biden's first 4 years, before any progressive measures are put in place.
This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience. Learn More
It does suggest that there's a significant faction of biden voters who voted for their existing republican senator. Does also imply that there's a significant population that like republican rule but just hate trump.... or the existing senitor is just very well liked but they just don't like the guy on top.
Studying these numbers is... facinating. has a lot of implications. Suggests that if Trump was less divisive he could have very easily won.
Or the house votes for districts like California, new mex, and colorado. the mismatch between the president choice and the colours for the house elect are interesting.
Focused on those states that were strongly decided already to remove potential bias in swing states by focusing on those that both sides have accepted and have moved on from. Cause I did forsee someone's going to leap out and immediately say that swing states are full of fraud ballets. That one is an argument I want no part of, so I'm just looking at data that nobody's contesting.
that is interesting. because usually if people are set for a particular party you'd usually expect they'd vote all 3 of the same party. it's possible these may be unaligned voters who are just happy with how their current senator/house rep runs their district but just don't like the big boss?