Making sure all information given and received is as accurate as possible is never a waste of time.

That's understandable and others said, it wasn't a waste of time imo

Fair enough, and that's a good impulse, although I feel like sometimes people are overly concerned with doing things the "right" way. It's important to care for and have care for people you're doing something like this with, but there's such a thing as being overly serious too. You see this in practically every little community that springs up online: cooking, swords and armor, woodworking, electronics, you name it. People will draw up some basic guidelines to help avoid needless grief, and most people will get it, but some will seize on it and start treating them as Revealed Truth rather than practical, imperfect tips, which especially becomes a problem when some of them eventually turn out to be misleading or just dead wrong. This is exactly how religions (and religious conflicts) get started.

That said I don't know what all the hubbub was here, maybe it was legitimate. But at least from what I read nothing stood out as glaringly, obviously wrong (aside from the grammar error I nit-picked). Sorry the project didn't work out though, it was certainly well-intentioned. But I suppose that's the inherent trouble in ever trying to do something like this where you try to define something precisely: other people are going to have other definitions.

While I have not seen the picture, I am glad to see you are taking precautions against any misunderstandings.

I, may not have the full picture, but i believe revising it and rewording it is good, especially for the sake of making sure your intentions will not be misconstrude