The YCH problem
5 years ago
Hey people,
I know the YCH system is very flawed so I want your input to improve it and make it as fair as posible.
I'm looking for ideas not rants and complaints, criticism is ok as long as you share an idea on how make better.
Let me know your thoughts.
I know the YCH system is very flawed so I want your input to improve it and make it as fair as posible.
I'm looking for ideas not rants and complaints, criticism is ok as long as you share an idea on how make better.
Let me know your thoughts.
You can either do no AB with snipe protection.
Alternatively, you can do a blind auction where people submit their bids through a forum or similar and you announce the winner.
But ideally both for you and everyone else I think is you can make a submission for a fixed price that you would like to charge for the piece and you choose people after 24h for example that you wish to draw, that way you can also select which characters and similar fit your style better in your eyes.
But to be fair if you get a lot of attention then AB allowed like it is has nothing wrong really for you especially.
in a multiple character ych, limit it to one person per slot (limit how many slots one person could bid in)
if its a single slot, have an upper limit per bid to encourage competitive bidding between multiple people and not have one person put down, say, a $250+ gap between themselves and the previous bidder
whilst i know they don't sound... *sound*, but its the fairest for all that i can think of on a whim.
With the no AB option there will be the problem, its not gonna be possible for unwealthy persons ever to get one piece, as your art will skyrocket easily to 2000.
Something that can be made is to raffle the slots. Like you are only allowed to enter one or two slots and submit your form for them.
But its gonna be complicated.
Good luck till the next YCH! love your art <3
I see a rather ...unpleasant problem there for some costumers. Let’s say the artist doesn’t like one or any other character, that a costumer hopes to have drawn. And the artist "dislikes" their design to the point, where he would in all likelihood never pick them during any of his raffles.
Would you say the artist is in some way obliged in regards to morality, to be fair enough and inform these costumers about this circumstance?
Or would it be ok to simply avoid the drama, and let them get their hopes for a precious picture of their most favored artist up. Only to put time and effort into each futile attempt, just to be rewarded with disappointment and frustration time and time again.
I guess most will consider this scenario rather unlikely to happen to themselves, and therefore insignificant, given that such cases are usually rare and tend to have more specific reason for disqualification, than the artist’s personal taste.
While I made this sound rather dramatic, I still think it’s worth to at least consider such a scenario.
As well as the side effects it could have on the artist itself. If we’d say that an artist should theoretically be responsible and tell costumers with little to no chances off, what would probably happen?
Will the artist "have" to confront the frustration and anger of these people. I’ve seen a handful of artists over the last few years, who had a rather delicate personality. And saw them ending their careers due to circumstances which were far less troublesome, than this hypothetical scenario might possibly become.
And if the artist were to simply block these people and all their means of contacting them, how likely would you deem it, that they act like adults and quietly move on?
....well, maybe I’m just overthinking... I guess this or a similar kind of drama, could spring forth from any of the suggested options in this journal. After all, most of us have probably seen or heard about stories, of how utterly deranged and troublesome certain people can become.
Anyway, just thinking out loud...gotta get some sleep now.
I'm less fond of YCHs that have one sole winner.
As for YCH yeah, I agree with the sentiments above. Pull out that AB price. Let people pay what they want to pay.
https://ych.commishes.com/
That way people can bid in a more professional manner. Although I do not know if there is an Autobuy function at all
The problem isn't the bidding technology, the problem is that the AB price is too low given the demand.
Another option may be set a fixed price and put all the entrant in a raffle, leaving to fate the commitment to choose a winner.
2- Double your YCH AB's to $1100 OR Leave the bidding open with no AB, the second option allows you to find the market value people are willing to pay for your art. I suspect its easily over $1000
Not that I dont want Raiiji to make money, he deserves all the mons.
and like I said, he should totally raise his prices but it will suck for literally 80% of the people that have been waiting years. It's up to him though, and he should definitely be charging more than 100 a character. I agree with the YCH making bank there is no incentive for working on that list. Another option would be to just dismantle the list, but I dont think that would go over well either.
I think anyone who isn't okay with a commission price bump should probably be off the list regardless. You have no business contract/agreement. You're not entitled to be grandfathered in.
A: A quadrupling of the price is not a *bump* its a full on adjustment. A truly worthy one for the quality of art that is being made, but none the less, when some say bump they usually imply something along the lines of a 10-15%
B Following up on A, when and if the time comes, I think the waitlist should be nuked. One thing alot of people do when they get on said waitlist is set aside cash for the commission at the current prices. Since those expectations are no longer accurate, and thus it would better to force people to reevaluate their situation to see if they can fit into the new situation.
Also kills the chance for people who cant dump 4 digits on arts which sucks?
The process is, more or less, if Client A gets a slot from you in say...January, they go into a cooldown period where they cannot get another slot / YCH from you for a duration and period of time. You simply keep track of it by adding their name to January's cooldown list, and after that time elapses (say a month, two, or even three if you wish), they get moved off. Can even be set up and tracked in programs like Excel, or other spreadsheet programs, even trello I'd imagine.
If that process is too much, then the only thing you'd have to do is keep track of those who have already bought significant portions of work from you in the past. While I doubt the threat, or looming sensation has crept in just yet, if an artist is asked to continuously draw the same several characters over, and over, and over, and over again, I'd imagine that would get boring, or tiring at least. Even if the ideas are just barely different from one another.
Giving a large audience all a chance at having opportunities to get a piece from you also comes at a cost to you: stress and time. Especially if you go with the option I presented first with cooldowns. More work for you to keep track of, more frustration and anger out of your followers who want you to draw their porn fantasies.
It's a gambit of balance at this point. The point of a YCH system is to give people opportunities, but no matter what path you take in making it fair for everyone, it's still going to have its own brands of positives, and negatives.
All you can really do is conduct your business as you see fit. It's your job, and sure, options and opinions are great to get feedback from, at the end of the day, your business is your own, you're the boss. You're going to have some amazing clients, and some really intolerable ones. Doesn't matter how much money someone throws at you: a poor attitude client is not worth the dime they give you if they're going to make your job more difficult.
YCH / Slot cooldowns with tracking, or keeping AB-methods if you wish to continue working with the same few dozen people for another year. If you want fresher clients, I say keep the AB system, because people will over-inflate and over-saturate it with bids that will still upset people who were willing to pay for the normal AB slot prices that they budgeted for, but were just unlucky enough to miss the opportunity to snag.
Another technique I've seen people use successfully is to open the auction with no AB for the first 24 hours, then once bidding settles down a bit they add an AB price based on the current bidding (like 50% or 100% or whatever higher than the current bid, or just whatever price feels right).
You're never going to come up with a situation where you can draw affordable art for everyone who wants it. If you sold pieces for $150/ea you'd be drawing 5000 pics a month, or be drowning in a 5 year long waiting list, or making everyone-but-one-lucky-guy angry/disappointed by raffling spots.
If you end up getting $5k/pic or whatever then so be it. The people who want your art that much will be able to get it, and if you feel guilty then you can spread the love by using some of those mad furry dollars to buy art from other artists.
Other than that Removing the AB from a Ych is another way to stop it from selling in 10 seconds.
Good luck with whatever you decide to try out!
Ex: Say X person AB's YCH 1, the would have to wait till YCH 3 to AB again. It would at lease open up some opportunity for others to attempt to secure pieces from you.
Another potential solution would be to further fragment the YCH's themselves. Each slot having a smaller AB threshold that totals to the original AB for the full piece.
1: open a list to see who wants to AB the piece at your current prices. From there, after 24 hours raffle it off, ideally with some kind of limit (like someone who wins a slot can't win again for a set amount of time). It's honestly frustrating seeing some people have their characters in several of your ych slots and still not being able to get one myself.
2: increase your AB price. Even if you raised it to $1000 I still think they would sell within seconds. It may be out of the reach for some, but others might feel more inclined to save up and keep trying. You could of course raise them even higher to whatever you feel comfortable taking for the work you're putting in.
3: split pieces into several ych slots. So a 3 character piece is now 3 separate slots at the current price. This would help the amount of people each round go up and keep the possibility for everyone to have their character in a piece.
4: some combo of those because they're not exclusive by any means.
- Raffle slots off and have your prices go up.
- Increase your prices and do it per character
- Per character and the slots are raffled
- All of the above
Personally, I think a raffle feature with a frequency of customer limit seems the most fair to me, especially if it's included with the other two
And then also I mean, if your YCHs are being gobbled up in literal seconds... charge more for AB. The demand is there! I know artists can be hesitant to raise their prices but honestly if they are this popular you should charge more.
If you don't want to do that though you could wait 24hrs to update with an AB value (or just not offer an AB). You could raffle spots or choose your favorite from a list of submissions (downside: people potentially upset they don't get picked, they now blame you instead of whoever bid faster).
One of the main complains I had about this system is the fact some artists only had YCH pics, or most of their pics are of this kind of stuff, preventing people to know how their art looks like, through I think this is much a problem that FA and other sites geared to artists should solve in their own by having a special section for YCHs or similar stuff.
To cut down on abuse, blacklist people who aren't ready to pay after winning the raffle.
I simply knew how the system worked by observing past auctions, that the AB comment needed to be placed on your comment, which I see others being salty about saying it earlier than your comment, but if I could've claimed it without having to reply to you I would still have been quicker than them or someone else would've likely beat them. You've always worked the same way so it's a bit silly for people to be angry for not winning through a way that the auction doesn't work and I just got lucky with being the first. And as I mentioned, in the past with the male only thing, it was unfortunate for me as a girl, but you've the right to work however you desire, so I can't be mad at that either. You're the artist so you decide how things work, not us the commissioners and don't let angry people dictate the way you work, since there are plenty of people who appreciate and adore your work.
So yeah, it was one of the few opportunities for me to get to work with you so I took it! But for your own sake, to reduce anger/drama and increase the money you're making, a lack of AB would work much better and it would also reduce anxiety significantly for everyone who is trying to get art from you xD (since refreshing FA for a while is quite uhm, anxiety inducing lol). Even if that means I probably won't be able to afford it anymore, you deserve the bids, since you do awesome work!
I definitely agree that eliminating the AB option or delaying it makes the most sense. Doing FCFS or randomized or whatever just makes everyone who doesn't get it feel left out and disappointed. At least with high prices people can save up for a while to guarantee themselves a spot eventually if they really, really want it.
Side note, would be nice to see a preview of the YCHs before posting them. I wasn't personally going for any this time around but seeing the "Any Gender" options when you typically do "Male only" was a surprise and if I had the funds would have tried for C this time around.
AB has its merits, of course. If you remove it, it means that your YCH pieces become exclusive to the wealthiest clients (or, if not the wealthiest then the ones willing to spend the most). But, as it is right now your pieces are exclusive to whoever was lucky enough to see the post first, which can be frustrating to folks who have jobs, or responsibilities, who can only check FA a handful of times a day.
I have mixed feelings about the idea of submitting applications and leaving it to your choice. It allows you to draw what you feel, which is super important! Yet at the same time, it can leave people bitter because it takes the agency away from the bidders, and those not chosen may feel it was unfair (e.g. popufurs chosen over others).
I think an idea may be to have different kinds of YCHs. Maybe one kind that has an AB similar in price to your current ABs (or maybe higher, given your current popularity). These could be Flash YCHs. The other kind would have no AB and allow people to bid as much as they want.
Could also make autobuying way more risky by increasing the price. Like, say, if a piece was going to be $200, make it $300-400; or if it was $500 make it $900-1k (I know that one's a bit much, but just made it fit the formula.) That way people have to think twice before autobuying.
As other people have said, you could not do auto-buys, or maybe you could only retroactively add autobuys if sales are slow.
Also, if the cause of people rushing to buy your art and causing problems in YCH auctions is that your art is in high demand, maybe, Idk, take smaller commissions or make smaller ychs more frequently? I know that's a lot more work, but if you create more opportunities for people to get art from you, that could lessen the effects of your art being in high demand with low supply (not saying making the amount you do now is 'low-effort', 'slow' or 'not enough', just throwing out a suggestion)
Idk, my ideas probably don't help, feel free to ignore.
We're currently seeing versions of this play out in the physical good space with the scalping of next generation videogame consoles. In the context of physical goods, there are some guidelines for fairness. The desire is for the person who receives the direct sale of the MSRP console to be the end-user of the console. There may be no way to read someone's mind to ensure what they intend to do with a console, but we can mostly agree that at the end of the day this purchaser should be human, at least. So companies like Walmart have done their best to combat scalper bots, but have otherwise been unable to stem the tide of demand. If we define the basic guidelines for what a YCH transaction should accomplish, then we can start to understand which levers we can flip to optimize it.
The issue here is one of trade-offs. Retailers could lottery off their devices instead, but capitalism likes the notion of first-come-first-serve transactions for goods and services. This simply swaps out one perception of "fairness" for another. Instead of fair being determined by the person hitting refresh and devoting the most time, instead it's determined by randomness. This equalizes the playing field, but not in a way that allows for meritocratic demonstration of investment or interest. The person that barely cares about the PS5 - or barely noticed the opportunity for the YCH - has just as much of an opportunity to win as a diehard, frothing-at-the-mouth fanboy with the t-shirts and bedroom posters to prove it. However, it also provides an opportunity for someone who is a genuine, earnest fan to participate even if they don't have constant internet access, or often have to work when new YCH slots are posted, or live on the other side of the world. Is this more fair or less? Depends who's asking.
Retailers could raise their prices to select for those that "really want" a particular device, but this is a double-edged sword. First, there are many people who earnestly want a PS5 that can't afford to pay 2-3x MSRP for it, and second, there are many people who are scalpers or moderately-to-mostly apathetic to the next shiny good or service (in this case, a PS5) which can easily afford one. This is a fundamental issue with the pricing of luxury goods in a free market - as wealth becomes less and less equally distributed, pricing out interest selects more and more for the socioeconomically privileged than the "most earnest". Is this more fair or less? Depends who's asking.
So, let's make a list of principles we would want to have for a "fair" YCH, in theory:
1. Everyone who is a genuine, earnest fan should have a chance to but a slot at least once
2. No one should be prohibited from eventually purchasing at least one YCH due to cost
3. People who care more about the good or service should get a chance before those who are less invested
4. The artist should be treated fairly. This means reasonable compensation, reasonable hours, reasonable amounts of stress.
5. The customer should be satisfied that the work is unique to their character and personality, within reason
6. The artist should be able to balance YCH work with other creative and non-professional endeavors
You know that old joke about going to college? "Sex, Social Life, Schoolwork, Sleep. Pick two." Turns out the trade-offs around YCH organization are like that.
If you raise prices, you maximize #3 (for those that can afford it at all), but at the detriment of #2. If you switch to a lottery rather than first-come-first serve, you maximize #1, but at the expense of #3 - no guarantees that the superfans get to go first.
There are a few other alternatives, though. I've gotten a few pieces of art through Hazaky's "Unlimited YCH" system. The gender, body type, pose, and background are all predetermined, but it is open to as many people as would like to have it. What are the trade-offs here? Well, for one, we're maximizing #1 again at the expense of #3 and #4. This system does not select for the most earnest fans, and it can also be taxing for an artist - there is a finite amount of time in a given day, week, month, et cetera. But also - it is creatively limiting as well. So we're starting to miss out on #5 and #6. There's a certain amount of risk in burning out when working on the same basic outline over and over and over. And spending more time doing that means spending less time with fewer slots that allow the artist to assuage a greater amount of creativity and ability to use YCH's' as an avenue for experimentation. As far as price goes, this seems to strike a nice balance. If the artist can reuse some of their work, then the amount of dollars-per-hour seems to be greater than doing individual commissions or separate YCH's. So, pros: more accessible, less of a race, more price-effective for artist and commissioner. Cons? Less creative freedom, more risk of burnout, more frustration for those that feel they could get a YCH in the current system and have to wait longer for one they think fits their ideas, and the commissioners don't get a sense of having a unique status symbol to show their friends. When everyone is special, no one will be. Is this more fair or less? Depends who you're asking.
Another option is to take an approach similar to Feralise, where instead of a lottery, slots are submitted for ideas rather than YCH's. This isn't quite the same thing, but it's a different-enough trade-off to be worth mentioning. Pricing is still a matter of what an individual artist thinks is reasonable (coughmdfcough), so this doesn't help one way or the other with #1 or #2. However, it can select for earnestness while also preserving the creative integrity and fair treatment of the artist. That's #3, #4, and #6. #5 is subjective here, but generally better than something like an unlimited YCH. So what do we give up? No pre-fab sketches, so not generally a true YCH. It still doesn't really solve the problem of the quiet voices getting drowned out or priced out. And it can be a lot to ask for a popular artist to read through and choose from dozens or hundreds of ideas for any given slot. But if the submission process is "blind", there is a certain kindness in not having to outwardly reject an idea that you dislike. The assumption is that there is a finite amount of time, and other ideas were just better / more interesting. There's also the implication here that only those that have new or interesting ideas are the most worthy of art. If they have an unremarkable character or prefer to give the artist more of a "blank slate" to work with, they are less likely to get a slot in this system. It selects both for novelty and for ideas that align well with the interests of the artist. Is this, as a whole, more fair or less? Depends who's asking.
For the last few options, let's do a rapid-fire round. You could limit access to patrons / discord members first. More selection for earnestness (#3) at the cost of pricing out people (#1 and #2). You could collaborate with other artists and specialize in having one person do coloring or shading or what have you. Lots of complexity and investment to set up, and you lose the distinctiveness of your artistic style in the gestalt, but the pipeline increases without drastically increasing your workload. More #1 and #2, less of #5 and #6. You could sell less complex version of your work. Tentative sketches, bases, things designed to be colored or "finished" by other artists or the customer themselves. More #1 and #2, less #5. Also more complicated to price fairly.
In the end, something has to give. We sacrifice the sanity and working hours of the artist, or the poor-but-earnest fan, or the exceptionally-creative-and-particular. It should be noted that the list of six example values above are non-exhaustive and may not match your point-of-view. Take the time to delineate what your values are for your art and your YCH process, and then rank them. If you can choose one over another, then the solution space starts to narrow considerably. Hopefully this helps. Cheers!
Those could be a few ways to make it feel like more people have opportunities. But overall, I think the first come first serve system as you are doing is the most fair way of doing these. If everyone was in a raffle, it becomes more disappointing for all those who lose the raffle, and if it is some kind of selection process, people will feel left out by that as well.
I feel this is the most fair to give people a shot at getting your art. People get a chance to see the image and no instant buyouts. One thing I would implement along with this is that whoever wins the raffle can't be part of the next few raffles. Seeing one person grab up multiple slots has always been my least favorite thing with ych's.
option B: You can remove the AB and sell to the highest bidder.
So in the end it all depends on you and how you want to run things. It is your job and you have to find the balance that you feel comfortable with.
People bet on a spot, highest bidder wins. Kinda like Ebay except with porn. What's the issue?
1: Submit your reference with a cooldown system
2: Raffle off the slots with a cooldown
Also, you could make each character in the ych's a different slot. That'll give more people chances to get in and you more money from each ych.
Demand is clearly off the charts but you also want to minimize the amount of frustration which occurs in public / visible auction systems so that sincere bids have a chance to beat out those who make the mistake of trying to lowball a slot despite having the money to pay for your work.
Alternatively, if you don't like the idea of raising your prices in any and you want to move away from the first bid, you can move to a timed opt-in only raffle system and televise the use of some wheel that picks a name from your list so that people know that you're not just playing favorites.
That last part though, sounded like you’re aiming your "frustration" towards the wrong person~
While surely everyone agrees on raising the prices to a appropriate level. The dimensions that some rather carefree appearing people suggest, especially those who coincidentally own a art collection filled to the brim with pricy high quality artwork, seem certainly a "little bit" biased~
A lot of people really want to support your art more directly, so adding more opportunities to get art from you while also raising the prices a bit to reflect that seems like one of the Best ways IMO
I also concur with the other comments suggesting a sort of "cooldown" period wherein a previous auction winner can't win again for some time.
Ultimately, though, this is business. If the same people continually want to bid very large sums of money for your work, take it as a compliment and accept the work.
I would suggest not returning to your commission waitlist, since it is so outdated and overloaded, that it would punish the vast majority of fans/customers which simply came to you a bit later than others.
2. 24 hour snipe protection (auctions don't end until there's no higher bids for 24 hours)
-shrugs- o.o
1) Create a raffle system
2) Application system for characters to be featured in your art for private YCH's
3) Raise the AB price to 700 USD
4) Snipe protection - wait till at least 30 minutes after the last bid to close the ych
5) Create three queues - 1) patreon only YCH 2) Wait list 3) General YCH
One thing I would do is limit the amount of times people can get recurring commissions from you, if you state it as a rule I'm sure that would help with some light enforcement and prevent someone from making you their own personal artist.
I'm not sure how you're feeling about the wait list, but I'd create a rolling commission system where there's a limit to the number of people on the waiting list at any given time. Creating a giant list can create a lot of stress for those on it and for yourself, it's like looking at an endless to do and losing hope that you'll ever get to the bottom of it. For your own well being, I'd figure out a way to shorten it and make a raffle system for the wait list where the last person on that list doesn't have to wait more than 3-4 months till the start of work. That might mean only 5 folks at a time or 20, depends how much bandwidth you want to devote to the wait list versus your YCHs.
Because the instant over AB YCHs are getting depressing.
1 Increase the AB as a first change
2 Add a cooldown to how often people can win to spread it around/vary your portfolio
3 If thats still not enough change AB so instead of an automatic win it starts a 24h timer. Anyone who ABs in that time gets entered into a raffle for the slot.
One idea that you shouldn't do that comes up a lot is splitting the slots in each piece into multiple auctions. I don't want to be in a sexy piece with strangers and a lot of other people would feel the same.
De esa manera podrías averiguar cuánto es que la gente acepta pagar por tus cosas para poder poner después los futuros YCHs a un precio fijo más alto que el actual. (Porque la verdad, yo considero que quinientas lucas por una ilustración de hasta 3 personajes es muy poco :( )
Además de ello, como leí por ahí, también apoyo la idea de que elimines tu waitlist para poder poner precios a las comisiones personalizadas que sean más justos con tus trabajos. Por ejemplo, 350 o algo así por un personaje solo más fondo.
Yo recuerdo que eres de Chile por ende me imagino que ganar más sería bien ventajoso con cómo está la situación en el país. Yo también soy Chilena, por eso mismo cobro harto lol.
Oh oh y lo último es que; siempre habrán tipos/as descontentos con cómo decidas hacer las cosas. Pero debes no dejarte desalentar por ellos, no vale la pena sentirse mal o dejar de lado las habilidades que has ganado en tantos años por wns quejumbrosos.
This really gives couples a chance to win an ych without the risk to suddenly have a random person win the other character of the ych. My bf has had this once and it was really difficult to get out of. Therefore ych's whete you bid for the whole artwork would also be cool (posting some of those as well as normal ones, to mix it up a bit)
or if you like doing an ych twice you could oost it twice, once where you bid per character and once where you bid for the whole piece. Though not everyone likes the idea of buying an ych that also exists with ither characters and therefore not being unique anymore
Post your YCH as normal but do NOT allow bidding to start. Simply post the YCH so people know what to expect.
Then in the description post the exact date and time that the YCH will be officially posted so that if someone really wants it they can at least have a fighting chance rather than the YCH going live at a random time where someone might be looking away or asleep.
This is how most online retailers sell collectibles. They’ll make their announcement of what’s to come and then give a date and time in which the item in question will be for sale. First come first serve. But at that point at least people have an idea so if they want it bad enough they’ll set alarms and reminders. The advantage to posting the YCH early for people to see will give people a chance to look at it and see if it’s something they want rather than just being impulse.
One thing I hate with YCHs or commissions is raffles. It’s very disheartening and when like 500+ people enter EVERY TIME then the odds of you winning are basically 0.
But also if he posts the initial sketch of the YCH instead of a journal he can get more eyes on it and also see if people are into the idea itself.
Imagine going to GameStop in line for a PS5 and they raffle it off? That’s unfair to the people who made an effort to be there early.
But it doesn’t matter if the opening time is unknown.
The issue can be easily fixed by preventing/ignoring ALL AB offers with the potential of driving the price of the YCH higher. This isn't truly an issue, however, as people will get what they pay for and it is up to them to dictate the value of Rajii's artwork. "I got carried away" isn't an excuse. In turn, this can generate more income for Rajii. The downside of course being that certain people will (they always will) rant about not being able to snipe up his YCHs anymore by instantly ABing it.
EDIT: (I also get this might've come off as hostile; that wasn't my intention!)
I think rajii should upload the actual ych so people can at least see what it is so they have time to make a decision if they want it instead of impulse buying it.
I’m on rajiis waiting list. Will I ever get my turn? Who knows. But I’m sorta waiting for that cause I’m hoping I won’t have to deal with the ych.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vickrey_auction
But there will be that one person that ways pays like 2k lol
I know artists who draw the same characters over and over because they seem to have a bottomless bank account
But yes I prefer commissions over YCHs simply because I have a dragon character which he usually doesn’t do proposed YCHs for. And even if he did it would sell out immediately because I won’t know what it is.
- Set price raffle. Let people enter, then draw lots, 1 lot to a person. The person who is drawn gets the commission - if the winner can not pay, redraw with their lot as forfeit.
If you have a raffle, there's no guarantee that you'll win, but you'll (ideally) have the same shot at a slot as everybody else. If you host an auction with no AB ceiling, then only the people with the deepest pockets will win. If the artist gets to choose, then there's the risk of favoritism -- no offense to Rajii or anything, but that concern has been expressed upon reading through some of these comments.
Rajii is well within their rights to do whatever they please, but if they want to make things fair and accessible to as many people as possible, then leaving the slot winners to chance, limiting slots to one-per and implementing timeouts is about as fair as it's going to get IMO. You and many others may not like it, but all things considered, it's still better than simply leaving the YCH situation as is.
I think a lot of people impulse buy even if they don’t like the ych itself simply to get art at all. Hell I’ve done it before. I didn’t like the theme of the art but I knew it was my only opportunity so I took it
In conclusion the best and most possible chance that is extremely fair is locking it to 15 abs per slot.
A. 15 people entered ab
B. 15 people entered ab
C. 15 people entered ab
You run the raffle to randomly pick the winner 3 winners.
They cannot enter other slot but only one just like they limited to one YCH
Once the winners are posted. The rest who entered cannot enter next month ych to give others a chance. They have to respect this.
After this month the previous who have entered have a better odd of winning next ych. This does not increase every time just once and it expires just like a coupon.
Always verify the winner if they are trying to get alt in and if they have won before. If so ban them from ever entering ych cause of violation.
This is the best possible for being fair for the flawed system and in fact I don't mind this.
Announce when you open or close wait list to let them know
Going with a lot of what others have been saying, it's probably best if you limit YCHs to one per person. Those who want to buy one can apply, and you could either go the raffle route or choose the characters based on what you had in mind when creating the initial sketch.
Furthermore, the person who got their YCH for that period of time shouldn't be able to get a shot at another one until after the next batch of YCH slots that you open up. So, assuming you continue doing monthly YCHs, if someone got a YCH in January, they wouldn't be able to sign up again for another chance at a slot until March.
I know it might seem unfair to some people, but I think this is probably the best way to keep YCHs relatively accessible to as many people as possible instead of having auctions with no AB ceiling, which would leave only the people with the deepest pockets fighting among themselves for a slot.
That said, it's your art, and as it's been mentioned before, you clearly have the capacity to charge more or simply let the wealthiest duke it out. Regardless of your decision, I still look forward to getting another piece from you should the opportunity arise.
It's not fair that AB goes to whoever is fastest, people like me who sleep during the day for nightshift usually get screwed this way
The way I see it, if multiple people want to AB and have the ability for it, let them have an equal chance at it? That's my suggestion, thank ya
You're the artist, should be able to decide what you actually want to spend time on, you know?
People are going to be unhappy - you're an awesome artist and demand is through the roof.
And you can set the AB price however high you want.
Give normal people a fighting chance against those with a 6 digit bank account or people who smash their refresh button to insta-claim slots.
I wish you the best <3
Normally I don't chime in due to how fascist people are these days but fa has become 90% ych spam so... there really isn't much left to loose. So telling people to do the overzealous censorship they always use with everything else seems fair. And now that's its needed no one will do it...