But that particular disabled person was playing on his disability to avoid consequences for trying to disrupt a political rally. It wasn't a blanket mockery of the disabled.

And I still fail to see a single instance of racism on Trump's part. Point one out, please? And no, pointing out that Mexico allows criminals to cross teh border is not anti-Hispanic racism.

What IS it about the left that you can't accept criticism of a member of a group without claiming it's criticism of the entire group?

I kinda think that your mind is already made up not to see anything the cheeto does as Racism. telling facts to you won't help, as you are sure to poop them. Why should bother?

You haven't come -up- with a fact demonstrating racism yet. Not by my standards. Remember, I don't consider insulting one person racist unless actual racist words are used. Anyone is allowed to criticize anyone else on a one-by-one basis. Calling unauthorized Mexicans crossing the border 'wetbacks' is racist. Calling them illegal aliens is not. Pointing out that a fair number of them are criminals above and beyond the border-breaking is not racist either, particularly when there is evidence for it. Point me at a spot where he actually used a racist word if you want me to believe it.

As I said, there's little point in bringing any evidence to you, as you will not accept it as such. David Duke support, I suppose is not telling, but hiring sessions who IS racist, and Steve Bannon who is also racist, is not a definition that he is okay with racism, I googled it, and easily found things. Trump's attack on the gold star family, for starters, his attack on Gonzalo Curiel, (the judge hearing a case against trump) this has gone on for some time, as the justice department sued him for not renting to blacks in the 70's. I don't expect you to acknowledge any of this as truth, as the cheeto is a republican,
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry.....b03260bf777e83
I will still say he is racist, Will you give him the Bellamy salute?

Attacking -one- gold star family when they initiated the battle is not racist. Are you going to denounce the folks who were attacking veterans and gold star families outside the Veteran's Inaugural Ball? And I seem to recall that he denounced the Duke and KKK endorsements. Did Hillary do the same with the BLM people? Curiel -is- a member of La Raza, so we've got a case of pot and kettle going there... and if you have to go back to the 70's, you're reaching. In the '70's, Robert Byrd was a card carrying member of the KKK.

As for Sessions and Bannon? They're no more racist than Bill Cosby or Ben Carson. You just don't like their politics.

Are you crazy? is that your problem? Session was denied a seat on the federal bench for his racism, and Bannon? his ex-wife, Marie Louise Piccard, (I am not making that one up) claimed that he said this: ... The biggest problem he had with Archer [School for Girls] is the number of Jews that attend. He said that he doesn’t like Jews and that he doesn’t like the way they raise their kids to be ‘whiney brats’ and that he didn't want the girls going to school with Jews.

as I said, you would not accept anything as proof of racism because you support the right.

Sessions was denied a seat on the bench by people who -claimed- he was racist. Not the same thing. I've seen the original docs on that. Bannon, though, that's a new one, and does meet my standards. Do you have a link?

yes. this is where I found the quote.

https://www.romper.com/p/7-steve-ba.....ncerning-22875

and if you were gay. you would be in even worse shape. remember what Hitler did?

step 1. for Hitler was to discredit the media.
step two was to silence scientists and governmentt employees.
step three was Hate crimes against minorities grew to the highest in their country's history. Clashes between partys became so extensive that Hitler ended civil liberties.
step four. Wealthy supporters purchased media outlets, employing only those faithful to the ruling party.
step five. Hitler declared that the only way the country could be unified was to restore traditional values, Minoritys including gays, the disabled, non-christians and people of color were considered inferior, and sent to death camps for slaughter.

we are on step two.

Trump doesn't give a damn about orientation, near as I can tell. And I see we've hit Godwin already...

1. The media has discredited themselves. Trump hasn't had to do much to help. And this time, we have the Net. The old-style media is dying on the vine anyway.

2. Stomping the idiots in the Global Warming racket and the lunatics at EPA is not shutting down scientists or useful government employees.

3. This was taken care of by his predecessor.

4. Intelligent wealthy folks won't touch dying media with a ten-foot pole.

5. I rather doubt we'll get near to this. Traditional values of the Republicans generally favor minority rights.


Okay, Bannon's #2 and #7 entries are disturbing. The rest do not constitute racism. I'll agree he shouldn't be a senior adviser.

I did think of Godwin before posting that, and accept that you would point that out. the only problem is that it's no less true.
what global warming racket? the rest of the world accepts that it is so, Republicans do not. this would wonder if there is a trouble with republicans rejecting science, possible because it might affect their bottom lines.
I am sorry, but I must disagree. hate crimes have increased with the Cheeto than before.

We will see what happens, but in 5 days, the cheeto has Restricted free speech, threatened martial law, Oppressed a religious minority, moved to sever international peace alliances, Attacked American voters, and Corrupted truth and replaced it with his personal delusions. Are you still gonna tell me to Give him a Chance?

The only increase in hate crimes since Trump was elected has been Trump-haters beating up on white folks.

And the global warming racket is just that. Guilty Euros buy into it. India and China are quite willing to claim reparations from it, though they do absolutely nothing to curb their own pollution footprints. I've seen the raw data, and the raw data doesn't support it. Russia thinks it's a crock, too. Let's face it, anyone who says 'the science is settled' is either lying or an idiot.

Lessee.. Restricted free speech? How? Calling on Fox News before MSNBC at a press conference is not restricting free speech.

Missed any threats of martial law.

Oppressed a religious minority? Keeping terrorists out, mayhaps?

Moved to sever international 'peace alliances'. Seem to recall he's reinstating a couple that Obama let wither.

Attacked American voters? Y'mean by making sure voters -are- Americans?

And he certainly has fewer delusions than Obama, so that's gotta be a net gain, no matter what.

you must have some hot crack in your pipe today. you have never agreed about the fact of global warming, no matter how much evidence presented to you.
http://www.climatecentral.org/news/.....d7-7ee9f0833f-303452469
Perhaps you have been living under a rock in Pennsylvania, but the cheeto declared that no government agency could speak to the public without his say. No science data that does not support him or his claims.
The Cheeto did threaten to send troops to Chicago.
I do not expect your support, and was surprised to see you agree about Bannon.
The Cheeto is a bad thing for America. Not that Pence will be so much better, but at least he is not as insane as his partner.
I would welcome a 25th amendment removal. There's no politer way to say he's nuts that I know of...

I generally don't agree to 'facts' that aren't actually facts, no. Remember, I can do real math and read raw data. Global Warming is at best a failure to comprehend that cycles are cyclical, and at worst an attempt to scare people into giving the government power over the economy to stop something that isn't actually happening. They act like CO2 is the only factor in heat retention when it isn't even a major one, make unwarranted assumptions about the pre-industrial level, cherry-pick data, MAKE UP data - something like a third of the weather stations they routinely report don't exist any more. They make up numbers for them. And half the rest have moved from rural to urban heat islands. That alone accounts for the 'warming' observed. Sea level hasn't risen according to the satellites, nor have temperatures. And the Arctic sea ice is -expanding- again.

Telling the executive branch to stop spouting nonsense until he can review policies? Considering who's currently in dozens of agencies, I don't blame him.

Ah, Chicago. That place should -be- under martial law. I rather think that was an -offer- to help, though, not a threat.

Don't forget that the, "goofball, miscreant ball-tuggers" to quote Victor Sarrano, don't even know how to solve global warming. They think by reducing carbon waste, they'll stop global warming. The problem is that other greenhouses gases build in the place of CO2, China, India and the developing world won't give a fuck about carbon regulations and CO2 will still be building.

When you hear a democrat/soc-prog/libtard talk about global warming and they don't mention carbon sequestration, you can know immediately that you're dealing with a retard that bought into buzzwords instead of actually looking into the solution for themselves. We know how to reduce atmospheric carbon, but those idiots on the left want to propagate Global Warming to continue to make money.


Fuckin' white liberals and their ignorant fee-fees.

Bingo. My touchstone on anyone spouting 'but carbon is eeeevul!' is to ask if they are in favor of nuclear power instead, since it doesn't produce carbon. This usually makes their heads explode. If they still insist on the idea that CO2 is polluting, I'll get snarky and invite them to stop exhaling...